Acoustic Event Detection Using Segmented ML Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current acoustic event detection systems in security and monitoring systems face challenges with high latency and false alarm rates, particularly in distinguishing between various acoustic events such as human speech, footsteps, and other noises, which affects their accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The system employs event aggregation and bypass processing techniques to enhance confidence in event detection, using machine learning models to differentiate between event types and only generate alerts when certain confidence thresholds are met, thereby reducing false alarms and improving response time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional acoustic event detection methods are used, then the system can detect acoustic events, but the latency is high and false alarm rates are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The acoustic event detection system is divided into multiple independent detection models, each specialized for detecting specific types of acoustic events (e.g., human speech, footsteps, alarms). This segmentation allows parallel processing of different event types, reducing overall latency while maintaining high detection accuracy for each event category through specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a two-stage detection approach where a first detection model performs initial screening to identify potential acoustic events, and a second detection model performs more thorough analysis only on suspicious cases. This partial action strategy reduces false alarms by applying excessive verification only where needed, rather than uniformly to all audio inputs, thereby reducing latency for clear cases while maintaining high reliability for ambiguous cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If traditional acoustic event detection methods are used, then the system can detect acoustic events, but the false alarm rate is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection task into multiple specialized models, each trained to recognize specific acoustic event patterns. This segmentation reduces false alarms because each model focuses on its specific event type rather than trying to detect all events generically, improving reliability without requiring a single overly complex model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A confidence threshold mechanism acts as an intermediary between the detection models and alert generation. The system introduces intermediate confidence scoring and threshold-based filtering that mediates between raw detection outputs and final alerts, reducing false alarms by requiring confidence thresholds to be met before generating alerts, while keeping the overall system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If the system generates alerts for all detected events, then the response time is fast, but the false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial verification by using a first detection model for rapid initial screening and reserving more thorough second-stage verification only for cases that meet specific confidence thresholds or event type criteria. This allows fast response times for high-confidence detections while applying excessive verification only where needed to reduce false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters such as confidence thresholds based on the type of acoustic event detected and the current operational context. By changing parameters like threshold sensitivity according to the specific event type and situational requirements, the system achieves fast response for critical events while maintaining low false alarm rates through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12068001B2Acoustic event detection
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12068001B2 patent drawing
  • US12068001B2 patent drawing
  • US12068001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for detecting certain acoustic events from audio data are described. A system may perform event aggregation for certain types of events before sending an output to a device representing the event is detected. The system may bypass the event aggregation process for certain types of events that the system may detect with a high level of confidence. In such cases, the system may send an output to the device when the event is detected. The system may be used to detect acoustic events representing presence of a person or other harmful circumstances (such as, fire, smoke, etc.) in a home, an office, a store, or other types of indoor settings.