Acoustic Wave Filter Electrode Layout for Pass-Band Ripple Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing acoustic wave filters with longitudinally coupled resonators experience ripples in the pass band due to significant differences in the number of electrode fingers between resonators.

Innovation Solution

The acoustic wave filter design includes a plurality of longitudinally coupled resonators, where each resonator has three IDT electrodes with specific configurations of wide and narrow pitch electrode finger groups. The number of electrode fingers in these groups is adjusted to fall within specific percentage ranges relative to each other, reducing ripple occurrence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the numbers of electrode fingers largely differ between the one longitudinally coupled resonator and the other longitudinally coupled resonator, then the acoustic wave filter can be designed with different resonator configurations, but ripples occur in the pass band

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonator configuration flexibilityVSAvoidripples in pass band
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by carefully controlling the number of electrode fingers in the IDT electrodes of longitudinally coupled resonators. Specifically, it sets the number of electrode fingers of IDT electrodes in different resonators to differ by a controlled amount (1-11 fingers), which prevents excessive parameter divergence while maintaining design flexibility. This controlled parameter adjustment eliminates ripples in the pass band by ensuring proper impedance matching and wave propagation characteristics across coupled resonators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the numbers of electrode fingers are controlled to reduce ripples, then the pass band quality improves, but the device complexity increases due to precise finger count requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepass band qualityVSAvoidelectrode finger configuration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for electrode finger counts (differing by 1-11 fingers between resonators) to optimize pass band quality. This approach balances reliability improvement with manageable complexity by providing clear design guidelines rather than requiring excessive precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by controlling only the critical parameter of electrode finger count difference within specific ranges, rather than optimizing all possible geometric and electrical parameters. This focused approach achieves sufficient pass band quality while avoiding the complexity of comprehensive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces or prevents ripples in the pass band of the acoustic wave filter, improving its frequency response characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

each of the first longitudinally coupled resonator and the second longitudinally coupled resonator includes three IDT electrodes that include a plurality of electrode fingers extending in a first direction along a main surface of a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12348218B2Acoustic wave filter
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US12348218B2 patent drawing
  • US12348218B2 patent drawing
  • US12348218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic wave filter includes a first longitudinally coupled resonator including first and second IDT electrodes, and a second longitudinally coupled resonator including third and fourth IDT electrodes. Each IDT electrode includes a wide pitch electrode finger group and a narrow pitch electrode finger group. A number of electrode fingers in the wide pitch electrode finger group of the first IDT electrode is smaller than that in the wide pitch electrode finger group of the second IDT electrode by a percentage equal to or more than about 4.2% and equal to or less than about 23.5%. A number of the electrode fingers in the wide pitch electrode finger group of the IDT electrode third is smaller than that in the wide pitch electrode finger group of the fourth IDT electrode by a percentage equal to or more than about 9.5% and equal to or less than about 52.4%.