Acoustic Logging Tool Guided Wave Noise Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying leaks in oil or gas wells are slow and computationally intensive due to the need to stop and 'listen' for noise and vibration, which allows pressure leaks to expand and complicate remedial activities.

Innovation Solution

The use of an acoustic logging tool with a receiver array that continuously records signals and employs beamforming algorithms to remove guided-wave noise, allowing for high-resolution leak detection without stopping, using time-domain or frequency-domain methods to isolate leak signals from noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If logging instruments stop to listen for leaks, then leak detection accuracy is improved, but logging time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection accuracyVSAvoidlogging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary noise characterization and filtering setup before leak detection, allowing continuous logging without stopping while maintaining detection accuracy through pre-configured signal processing parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The logging instrument continues moving through the wellbore without stopping, continuously recording acoustic signals while the signal processing system continuously filters guided wave noise and detects leak signals in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If logging instruments stop to listen for leaks, then leak detection capability is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak signal detectionVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes the dominant guided wave noise component from the acoustic signal using slowness-based filtering, isolating the weaker leak signals for detection without requiring complex full-signal analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the acoustic signals into the slowness domain to separate guided wave noise from leak signals based on their different propagation characteristics, enabling simpler detection in the transformed parameter space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If logging instruments stop to listen for leaks, then noise and vibration from the instrument are reduced, but logging time and operational duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument noiseVSAvoidlogging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system accepts the guided wave noise generated by the moving instrument as an inevitable byproduct but uses its characteristic slowness signature to identify and remove it through adaptive filtering, converting the harmful noise into a detectable pattern that can be eliminated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables rapid, continuous leak detection within wellbores, reducing the time required to identify leaks and improving the accuracy of leak localization, thereby facilitating quicker and more effective remedial actions.

Implementation Method 1

acoustic signals generated from a leak and/or equipment contacting the borehole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

employing a beamforming algorithm to remove the guided wave noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeamforming:

Implementation Method 3

continuous logging operation in which the logging tool does not stop and 'listen' for leaks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic emission: Acoustic Emission

Data Source

PatentUS11946364B2Removing guided wave noise from recorded acoustic signals
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US11946364B2 patent drawing
  • US11946364B2 patent drawing
  • US11946364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for removing a guided wave noise in a time-domain may include recording one or more acoustic signals with one or more receivers at a first location, wherein the one or more acoustic signals are raw data. The method may further include determining a slowness range, estimating a downward guided wave noise by stacking the one or more acoustic signals based at least in part on a positive slowness, estimating an upward guided wave noise by stacking the one or more acoustic signals based at least in part on a negative slowness, and identifying a dominant direction of propagation. The method may further include identifying a slowness from a highest stacked amplitude for the dominant direction of propagation, estimating a downward guided wave noise with the slowness, estimating an upward guided wave noise with the slowness, and subtracting the downward guided wave noise and the upward guided wave noise.