Acoustic Leak Detection Sensor with Wake-Up Circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional leak detection systems in piping systems face challenges such as false readings, delayed detection due to ambient noise, reliance on centralized hubs, and power consumption issues, leading to inefficiencies in identifying and locating leaks.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring system with sensors, a wake-up circuit, and a processor that can detect audio signals from piping sections, using machine learning algorithms to differentiate between normal and faulty operating conditions, and communicate directly to actuate valves without a central hub, enabling real-time monitoring and noise-cancellation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If audio leak detection techniques are used to detect leaks in piping systems, then leak detection capability is improved, but false-positive detections occur due to vibrations from various sources including ambient noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors acoustic signals and uses feedback loops to adjust detection thresholds and parameters based on learned patterns from normal operating conditions, improving the ability to distinguish true leaks from false positives while maintaining high detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters such as frequency ranges, sensitivity thresholds, and signal processing filters based on ambient noise conditions and operational context, allowing accurate leak detection across varying environmental conditions while reducing false positives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If leak detection is conducted during quiet hours only to reduce false positives, then detection accuracy is improved, but detection is delayed until quiet hours begin

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational state between sleep and active modes based on real-time acoustic signal analysis, allowing it to remain mostly dormant while quickly activating when potential leak signals are detected, thus reducing both false positives and detection delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and pre-processing of acoustic signals even in low-power states, preparing detection algorithms and thresholds in advance so that when a potential leak occurs, the system can immediately begin full analysis without waiting for scheduled quiet hours

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If always-on leak detection systems are used to detect leaks immediately, then detection speed is improved, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic sampling and event-triggered activation rather than continuous full-power operation, entering sleep modes between potential leak events while maintaining the ability to quickly detect and respond to leaks when they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously manages its own power consumption by monitoring acoustic signal levels and automatically transitioning between power states, using local decision-making to determine when full detection capabilities are needed versus when reduced-power monitoring suffices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Use of energy by moving object

If interval-based leak detection is used to reduce power consumption, then power usage is reduced, but detection is delayed until the next scheduled check

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddetection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from acoustic signal monitoring to dynamically adjust the interval between detection cycles, shortening intervals when potential leak signals are detected and extending them during normal operation, thus balancing power consumption with detection speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system transitions from static interval-based sampling to dynamic event-driven sampling, where the monitoring intensity and timing adapt in real-time based on acoustic signal characteristics, allowing the system to consume less power during normal operation while maintaining rapid detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Loss of information

If a centralized hub is used to process sensor data and locate leaks, then data processing capability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides data processing functions into distributed segments across multiple autonomous sensor nodes, with each node performing local signal processing and leak detection while sharing results peer-to-peer, eliminating the need for a centralized hub and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each sensor node autonomously processes its own acoustic data and makes independent leak detection decisions, with nodes self-organizing into a distributed network that collectively provides system-wide monitoring without requiring centralized control or coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

6Reliability

If multiple sensors are deployed over a piping system to improve detection coverage, then leak detection accuracy is improved, but communication complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidcommunication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges communication functions into the acoustic signal transmission itself, where sensor nodes use the existing acoustic medium to exchange detection data and coordinate leak localization, eliminating the need for separate communication infrastructure and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces false readings, allows for real-time leak detection in various noise conditions, eliminates the need for centralized hubs, and minimizes power consumption, providing efficient and accurate leak identification and mitigation.

Implementation Method 1

a transducer configured such that an audio signal emanating in the piping section induces the transducer to produce a voltage signal indicative of the audio signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11313754B2Leak detection for piping systems using a sound signal
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11313754B2 patent drawing
  • US11313754B2 patent drawing
  • US11313754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system (100) for monitoring a pipe system (10) includes a first sensor device (102). The first sensor device (102) includes at least one sensor, a wake-up circuit (170), and a processor (172). The at least one sensor is configured to sense an operating characteristic of a piping section (12) of the pipe system (10), and includes a transducer configured such that an audio signal emanating in the piping section induces the transducer to produce a voltage signal indicative of the audio signal. The wake-up circuit (170) is operatively connected with the transducer, and generates a wake-up signal in response to the voltage signal being above a predetermined threshold. The processor (172) is operatively connected to the wake-up circuit (170) and to the at least one sensor, and is configured to identify an operating condition of the pipe system (10) with reference to the operating characteristic sensed by the at least one sensor in response to receiving the wake-up signal.