Acoustic Limits for Thermal Control in Information Handling Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thermal management systems in information handling systems face challenges in reducing noise pollution from air movers, as increased airflow speed leads to bothersome sound levels, particularly in occupied environments, necessitating a solution to control air mover speeds while maintaining effective cooling.

Innovation Solution

A thermal management system that includes a thermal manager to determine and enforce an acoustic limit on air mover speeds, correlating sound levels to specific speed limits and controlling airflow to maintain quiet operation without compromising cooling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If air mover speed is increased to provide adequate cooling, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but sound level increases and becomes bothersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidsound level
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts air mover speeds based on real-time acoustic measurements from microphones. The thermal manager continuously monitors sound levels and modifies fan speeds to maintain cooling effectiveness while keeping noise below detected acoustic thresholds, making the cooling system adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where microphones detect acoustic levels, the thermal manager processes this information to determine acceptable speed limits, and air movers adjust their operation accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures cooling performance is maintained while respecting acoustic constraints in different environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If air mover speed is reduced to decrease sound level, then acoustic comfort is improved, but cooling effectiveness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound levelVSAvoidcooling effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism ensures that when air mover speeds are reduced for acoustic comfort, the thermal manager monitors temperature conditions and can trigger alerts or warnings if cooling effectiveness becomes insufficient, maintaining a balance between noise reduction and thermal management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the information from acoustic measurements to self-regulate air mover operation, automatically finding the optimal speed that provides adequate cooling while minimizing noise, without requiring manual intervention or sacrifice of cooling performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-generated harmful factors

If acoustic limits are enforced on air mover speeds, then operational quietness is improved, but system adaptability to different environments may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational quietnessVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than enforcing fixed acoustic limits, the system dynamically determines speed limits based on real-time environmental acoustic measurements. This allows the system to adapt to different environments - being quieter in office settings and allowing higher speeds in unattended data centers - making it versatile across multiple use cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the acoustic parameter thresholds based on detected environmental conditions. By measuring ambient acoustic levels and adjusting the acceptable noise floor accordingly, the system maintains operational quietness when needed while preserving adaptability to different deployment environments through parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces noise pollution while ensuring adequate cooling by dynamically adjusting air mover speeds based on acoustic limits, enhancing operational quietness in various environments without compromising thermal management performance.

Implementation Method 1

thermal management systems including air movers (e.g., cooling fans and blowers) have often been used in information handling systems to cool information handling systems and their components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

One problem with the use of air movers in cooling information handling systems is that air movers generate sound. Because sound generated by an air mover may increase as the speed of an air mover increases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic Noise:

Data Source

PatentUS11350543B2Systems and methods for acoustic limits of thermal control system in an information handling system
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 DELL PROD LP
  • US11350543B2 patent drawing
  • US11350543B2 patent drawing
  • US11350543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a cooling subsystem comprising at least one air mover configured to generate a cooling airflow in the system and a thermal manager communicatively coupled to the cooling subsystem for control of the cooling subsystem and configured to determine an acoustic limit associated with the cooling subsystem, correlate the acoustic limit to an acoustic-based air mover speed limit for the at least one air mover, and control the cooling subsystem to maintain an air mover speed of the at least one air mover below the acoustic-based air mover speed limit.