Acoustic Model Generation for Non-Native Pronunciation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) systems are ineffective in providing accurate feedback to language learners as they often rely on implicit scoring and do not account for phonological errors specific to the learner's native language, leading to difficulties in perceiving and correcting non-native sounds.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that generate acoustic models of alternative pronunciations based on a learner's native language, allowing for explicit feedback on mispronunciations by comparing acoustic data with pre-defined models, thereby identifying and addressing phonological errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If CAPT systems use implicit scoring and generic pronunciation assessment, then the system complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the measurement precision of pronunciation errors and the reliability of feedback are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments pronunciation assessment into multiple acoustic dimensions (formant frequencies, spectral characteristics, temporal patterns) and evaluates each dimension separately against native speaker benchmarks. This segmentation enables precise identification of specific phonological errors while maintaining systematic processing through automated acoustic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms pronunciation assessment from holistic implicit scoring to explicit parameter-based evaluation by measuring specific acoustic parameters (formant frequencies F1, F2, F3, spectral centroid, zero-crossing rate) and comparing them against standardized native speaker ranges. This parameter change enables precise error identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If CAPT systems provide comprehensive phonological error analysis based on native language, then the reliability and usefulness of feedback is improved, but the device complexity and computational requirements are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing acoustic models of native speaker pronunciations, creating reference databases of correct phonological patterns, and preparing phoneme-specific acoustic parameter ranges before actual learner assessment. This preliminary preparation enables reliable real-time error detection without complex processing during assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces acoustic models and phonological rule engines as intermediaries between raw learner speech and feedback generation. These intermediaries translate acoustic measurements into phonological error diagnoses by comparing learner speech against native language models, reducing the complexity of direct analysis while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If CAPT systems focus on general pronunciation scoring, then the adaptability to different learners is improved, but the ability to provide L1-specific phonological error diagnosis is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the acoustic analysis to each learner's specific native language (L1) characteristics. Different phonological error patterns, acoustic parameter ranges, and reference models are applied based on the learner's L1, enabling precise diagnosis of L1-specific interference errors while maintaining adaptability to various language backgrounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the assessment system adaptive to different learner profiles. The system dynamically selects appropriate phonological models, adjusts acoustic parameter thresholds, and modifies feedback content based on the learner's native language and individual error patterns, enabling both adaptability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10679616B2Generating acoustic models of alternative pronunciations for utterances spoken by a language learner in a non-native language
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 ROSETTA STONE LTD
  • US10679616B2 patent drawing
  • US10679616B2 patent drawing
  • US10679616B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory processor-readable medium storing code representing instructions to be executed by a processor includes code to cause the processor to receive acoustic data representing an utterance spoken by a language learner in a non-native language in response to prompting the language learner to recite a word in the non-native language and receive a pronunciation lexicon of the word in the non-native language. The pronunciation lexicon includes at least one alternative pronunciation of the word based on a pronunciation lexicon of a native language of the language learner. The code causes the processor to generate an acoustic model of the at least one alternative pronunciation in the non-native language and identify a mispronunciation of the word in the utterance based on a comparison of the acoustic data with the acoustic model. The code causes the processor to send feedback related to the mispronunciation of the word to the language learner.