Acoustic Probe Compressive Sampling for Lower Data Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-destructive inspection probes face challenges with high hardware complexity and data rate due to the large amount of data generated by full matrix sampling of sensing elements, which increases with the count of elements.

Innovation Solution

Implement compressive sensing techniques to under-sample acoustic data from a matrix of sensing elements, reconstructing images using a subset of samples, thereby reducing hardware size and data rate without sacrificing image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full matrix sampling is used to capture acoustic data from all sensing elements, then image quality and defect detection accuracy are improved, but data quantity and hardware complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for image reconstruction by applying compressive sensing techniques. Instead of capturing all N samples from the full matrix of sensing elements, the system selectively acquires a reduced subset of M samples (where M < N) that contain sufficient information to reconstruct the acoustic image, thereby reducing hardware complexity while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by acquiring less than the full set of samples (M out of N samples) needed for complete matrix capture. The compressive sensing algorithm processes this partial data set to reconstruct the full image, demonstrating that complete sampling is not necessary when using appropriate reconstruction techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If full matrix sampling is used to capture acoustic data from all sensing elements, then image quality and defect detection accuracy are improved, but data quantity and transmission requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoiddata quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for image reconstruction by applying compressive sensing techniques. Instead of capturing all N samples from the full matrix of sensing elements, the system selectively acquires a reduced subset of M samples (where M < N) that contain sufficient information to reconstruct the acoustic image, thereby reducing data quantity while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the sampling parameter from full matrix (N samples) to compressed sampling (M samples). By modifying the sampling rate and selecting specific subsets of sensing elements to activate, the system reduces the total number of samples acquired while maintaining image quality through compressive reconstruction algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the count of sensing elements is increased to improve inspection coverage, then measurement capability is improved, but hardware size and data rate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidhardware size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes each sensing element in the matrix multi-functional by enabling them to serve both as transmit and receive elements. The compressive sensing approach allows the system to achieve full matrix capture functionality with reduced hardware activation, as not all elements need to be simultaneously active to achieve complete inspection coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by activating only a subset of sensing elements at any given time rather than using all elements simultaneously. This reduces the instantaneous hardware requirements and data processing burden while still achieving comprehensive inspection coverage through the compressed sensing reconstruction process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Compressive sensing significantly reduces data quantity and hardware requirements while maintaining image quality, achieving comparable defect detection to full matrix sampling with a fraction of the data and resources.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining signals representative of one or more acoustic waves received using a matrix of sensing elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic detection: Acoustics

Data Source

PatentUS12431149B2Compressive sensing for full matrix capture
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 EVIDENT CANADA INC
  • US12431149B2 patent drawing
  • US12431149B2 patent drawing
  • US12431149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of the present subject matter provide techniques for compressive sampling of acoustic data. A probe may sample in a compression mode, such that the entire matrix is not sampled at full-time resolution or spatial resolution. Therefore, the initial amount of data captured by the probe is reduced, allowing for lower density hardware (e.g., fewer analog-to-digital conversion channels or related analog front-end hardware) to be used at a lower data rate.