Acoustic Voice Activity Detection Using Dual-Microphone Noise Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional acoustic voice activity detectors (AVADs) face limitations in accurately detecting speech in noisy environments, leading to false positives and false negatives, which affect the performance of communication devices by either devoicing or failing to suppress noise effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Dual Omnidirectional Microphone Array (DOMA) and a combination of acoustic and vibration sensor-based voice activity detection algorithms, which form virtual microphones with distinct noise and speech responses, allowing for improved noise suppression and accurate speech detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional acoustic voice activity detection (AVAD) is used to detect speech in noisy environments, then noise suppression can be achieved, but false positives and false negatives increase, reducing detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppression effectivenessVSAvoidspeech detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the speech detection task into two independent detection paths: skin surface microphone (SSM)-based VAD and acoustic AVAD. Each detector operates independently with its own detection logic and thresholds, allowing the system to leverage the strengths of each method while mitigating their individual weaknesses through subsequent combination logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the outputs of multiple independent voice activity detectors (SSM VAD, acoustic AVAD, and their combinations) using logical operations. The final VAD signal is generated by combining detection results from different modalities (skin contact detection, acoustic analysis) to achieve more reliable speech detection with reduced false positives and negatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If conventional AVAD is tuned to reduce false positives, then denoising performance improves, but false negatives increase, causing devoicing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoidspeech detection completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different detection thresholds and logic rules to different detection scenarios and modalities. The SSM VAD uses one set of detection parameters optimized for contact-based detection, while the acoustic AVAD uses different parameters optimized for acoustic analysis. This allows each detector to operate at its optimal precision level for its specific modality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection using multiple independent VAD methods before generating the final speech activity determination. By having multiple detectors run in parallel and their results combined through logical operations, the system can identify speech events that might be missed by any single detector, preventing devoicing while maintaining false positive reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If skin contact is indicated and SSM VAD is used, then false AVAD indications are reduced, but diffuse noises cause false negative indications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection robustness in noisy environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary combination logic that mediates between the SSM VAD output and the acoustic AVAD output. The final VAD signal is generated by combining these two detection paths using logical operations, allowing the system to use the SSM VAD for accurate speech detection while compensating for its vulnerability to diffuse noises through the acoustic AVAD pathway

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If conventional solutions are used in highly reverberant environments, then device complexity is reduced, but false negative indications increase, leading to devoicing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system simplicityVSAvoidspeech detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection and combination of detection methods based on environmental conditions and signal characteristics. The system adaptively adjusts which detection paths are active and how their outputs are combined, allowing it to maintain high detection accuracy in challenging environments like highly reverberant conditions while managing device complexity through intelligent resource allocation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10230346B2Acoustic voice activity detection
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 JAWBONE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10230346B2 patent drawing
  • US10230346B2 patent drawing
  • US10230346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for acoustic voice activity detection (AVAD) is described, including detecting a signal associated with a subband from a microphone, performing an operation on data associated with the signal, the operation generating a value associated with the subband, and determining whether the value distinguishes the signal from noise by using the value to determine a signal-to-noise ratio and comparing the value to a threshold.