Overlay Content Delivery via ACR Comparison Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional TV advertising lacks the ability to target and personalize advertisements for specific viewers, resulting in reduced effectiveness and viewer engagement, as it assumes a single advertisement is preferred by all viewers, leading to undesirable outcomes such as skipped or ignored ads and negligible purchase intent.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that uses automatic content recognition (ACR) and comparison testing (like A/B testing, split testing, and multivariate testing) to determine preferred media segments or overlay content segments by displaying different ads to viewers and measuring their performance, allowing for tailored and contextually relevant content delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional TV advertising displays a single advertisement to all viewers, then the advertising system remains simple and easy to operate, but the advertisement effectiveness and viewer engagement deteriorate due to lack of personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvead effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the audience into different groups based on viewer profiles and segments advertisements into multiple versions tailored for different segments. The system divides the single advertising channel into multiple personalized streams, allowing different ads to be shown to different viewer segments simultaneously, thereby improving ad effectiveness without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by customizing advertisement content according to specific viewer characteristics and preferences. Each viewer receives advertisements with properties (content, timing, format) optimized for their individual profile, making the advertising experience locally optimized for each viewer rather than uniformly applied to all

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If comparison testing is implemented to determine preferred media segments, then viewer engagement and desired actions improve, but the system complexity and testing infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewer engagementVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by conducting comparison testing in advance to determine preferred media segments before actual advertising campaigns. Viewer preferences are pre-tested and pre-analyzed, allowing the system to make informed decisions about which advertisements to show to which viewers without requiring complex real-time testing infrastructure during live broadcasting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically conducting A/B tests, analyzing results, and making optimization decisions without requiring manual intervention. The testing framework autonomously manages multiple advertisement variants, tracks viewer responses, and automatically selects winning segments, reducing the operational complexity burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If overlay content segments are personalized based on viewer interests, then ad effectiveness and viewer retention improve, but the content delivery system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewer retentionVSAvoidcontent delivery complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making overlay content adaptive and changeable based on real-time viewer behavior and preferences. The content delivery system dynamically adjusts advertisement content, timing, and presentation based on viewer responses, allowing the system to optimize viewer retention without requiring a completely static and rigid content delivery infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (the content delivery system with ACR integration) that sits between the advertisement source and the viewer. This intermediary automatically matches overlay content to viewer profiles, manages personalization logic, and handles content insertion, thereby isolating the complexity from both the advertisement source and the viewer experience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11265592B2Content comparison testing on linear media streams
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 ROKU INC
  • US11265592B2 patent drawing
  • US11265592B2 patent drawing
  • US11265592B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed to include receiving first viewership information for a media segment displayed on a first electronic device, the first viewership information including a first viewership event associated with the media segment, where media content includes at least the media segment. The method can include receiving second viewership information for an overlay content segment displayed on a second electronic device, the second viewership information comprising a second viewership event associated with the overlay content segment. The method can include determining that a first viewership level for the overlay content segment is greater than a second viewership level for the media segment in view of the first viewership event or the second viewership event. The method can include sending a display instruction to a content management device instructing the content management device to send the overlay content segment to the first electronic device and the second electronic device.