Action Database Indexing for Diagnostic Process Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As products and services become increasingly complex, call centers face challenges in efficiently guiding diagnostic processes between call agents and callers, requiring more sophisticated support mechanisms that are flexible and cost-effective.

Innovation Solution

An action database system that indexes relevant actions based on the current state of the diagnostic process, allowing call agents to quickly resolve issues and enabling easy updates or changes to protocols, thereby enhancing the efficiency and flexibility of the diagnostic process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If increasingly complex processes are utilized to identify and support specific product and service issues, then the ability to handle complex products and services improves, but the device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex products and servicesVSAvoidcomplexity of diagnostic processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic process is segmented into discrete states, with each state representing a specific point in the diagnostic workflow. The action database is divided into indexed entries corresponding to each state, allowing call agents to navigate complex diagnostics through manageable, state-by-state steps rather than dealing with overwhelming complexity at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The action database serves as an intermediary between the complex diagnostic logic and the call agent. It stores pre-defined actions associated with each diagnostic state and provides guidance to agents, shielding them from the underlying complexity while maintaining adaptability to handle various product and service issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If sophisticated support mechanisms are implemented to guide diagnostic processes, then the quality of support improves, but the cost and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of supportVSAvoidprocessing and human resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Actions are pre-defined and stored in the action database for each diagnostic state before actual diagnostic needs arise. This preliminary preparation allows the system to provide high-quality support guidance without requiring complex real-time processing or extensive human resource intervention during actual diagnostic interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a standardized action database that can be replicated and applied across multiple diagnostic scenarios. Instead of creating custom complex support mechanisms for each case, the same structured approach with pre-defined actions is copied and adapted to different product and service issues, reducing resource requirements while maintaining support quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If the diagnostic process structure is changed to accommodate new protocols, then the adaptability improves, but the system requires costly redesigns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in protocol changesVSAvoidcost of system redesign
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The action database is designed to be dynamic and easily modifiable. New diagnostic protocols can be accommodated by adding or modifying entries in the action database without requiring structural changes to the underlying system architecture. This allows the system to adapt to new protocols while avoiding costly redesigns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The action database structure serves multiple functions: it stores diagnostic actions, provides guidance to call agents, and accommodates various diagnostic protocols. This universal structure can handle different product lines, service types, and protocol variations through a single unified system, eliminating the need for separate redesigns for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10861021B2State value indexing into an action database
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 ENT SERVICES DEV CORP LP
  • US10861021B2 patent drawing
  • US10861021B2 patent drawing
  • US10861021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example system includes system circuitry that includes an action database. The action database may include an action entry that stores an action for use by a call agent as part of a diagnostic process and an index value associated with the action. The index value may be indicative of a particular state of the diagnostic process. The system circuitry may obtain a state value indicative of a current state of the diagnostic process. The system circuitry may identify the action entry by matching the state value for the diagnostic process to the index value of the action entry. Then, the system circuitry may retrieve the action of the action entry for use in the diagnostic process.