Action Determination Using Vertical Acceleration Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing activity meters struggle to accurately distinguish between walking and running, especially when walking with intense vertical oscillation due to bending of the knees, leading to erroneous recognition of walking as running.

Innovation Solution

An action determination apparatus utilizing a three-axis acceleration sensor to measure acceleration on three axes (Sx, Sy, Sz) and a microcomputer to calculate acceleration on axes Gx, Gy, and Gz, where one axis is vertical and the others are parallel to the ground, comparing a threshold value with the vertical acceleration to determine the action type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the difference between maximum and minimum acceleration values is used to distinguish walking and running, then walking can be distinguished from slow running, but walking with intense vertical oscillation is erroneously recognized as running

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction type recognition accuracyVSAvoidrecognition reliability under intense vertical oscillation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the acceleration signal analysis into two distinct components: vertical oscillation analysis (maximum-minimum difference) and step frequency analysis (zero-crossing count). By dividing the recognition criteria into these separate segments, the system can evaluate both vertical motion intensity and stepping rhythm independently, then combine them for more reliable action type determination. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between walking with knee bending (high vertical oscillation but regular step frequency) and actual running (high vertical oscillation with different step frequency patterns).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dual-parameter recognition system that changes from using only vertical oscillation amplitude (maximum-minimum difference) to using both vertical oscillation amplitude and step frequency (zero-crossing count). By adding this additional parameter, the system gains more discriminative power to differentiate between walking and running actions. The recognition logic evaluates both parameters simultaneously, allowing accurate identification even when vertical oscillation alone is ambiguous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a fixed threshold value is used to determine action type, then the determination process is simple, but accurate determination becomes difficult when vertical oscillation is intense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination process simplicityVSAvoidaction type determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static threshold-based determination into a dynamic multi-criteria evaluation system. Instead of relying on a single fixed threshold for vertical oscillation, the system dynamically evaluates multiple parameters (maximum acceleration, minimum acceleration, zero-crossing count) and applies conditional logic that adapts to different motion patterns. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity through structured decision rules while achieving accurate determination through comprehensive parameter assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes raw acceleration data through multiple intermediate calculations before reaching the final action type determination. The system calculates intermediate values such as vertical oscillation amplitude, step frequency, and zero-crossing count, then uses these intermediates to inform the final classification. This intermediary processing layer acts as a mediator between simple measurement and accurate determination, maintaining ease of operation while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate determination of action type without mistakenly recognizing walking as running, even with intense vertical oscillation, by consistently comparing the vertical acceleration with a predetermined threshold value.

Implementation Method 1

a three-axis acceleration sensor that measures acceleration on each of three axes Sx, Sy, and Sz

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration sensor measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11452465B2Action determination apparatus and action determination method
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 SHARP KK
  • US11452465B2 patent drawing
  • US11452465B2 patent drawing
  • US11452465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Regarding acceleration on each of three axes Gx, Gy, and Gz calculated by a microcomputer, acceleration on one of the three axes is acceleration in a vertical direction perpendicular to the ground, and acceleration on each of the other two axes is acceleration in a direction parallel to the ground, the other two axes being perpendicular to each other. A type of action of the human body in a predetermined period is determined by comparing a predetermined threshold value with the acceleration in the vertical direction in the predetermined period.