Action Classification Using Fine-Grained Motion Attribute Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic action recognition systems struggle with accurately indexing and analyzing large variations of fast motion in athletic activities, particularly in sports like figure skating, due to their complexity and inefficiency in handling fine-grained actions with small differences in pose and duration.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fine-grained motion-attributes-aware policy (FMAP) agent that generates domain-specific fine-grained motion-attribute values and employs sparse discriminative frame sampling to identify relevant frames for action recognition, using deep reinforcement learning to refine neural networks for improved accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional action classification and recognition techniques are used, then the system can process athletic video content, but the system becomes very complex and relatively inaccurate for handling fast, large variations of athletic motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments video processing by selectively identifying and processing only relevant frames containing athletic actions rather than analyzing every frame. This is achieved through action detection mechanisms that filter frames based on motion characteristics and action probabilities, dividing the complex continuous video analysis into discrete actionable segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and focuses on key discriminative features from video frames, such as motion attributes, pose information, and action-specific characteristics. By taking out only the essential features needed for action recognition rather than processing all visual data, the system reduces complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If manual video searching and indexing is performed, then the user can find desired video segments, but the process becomes tedious and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo segment identification accuracyVSAvoidvideo processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automatic analysis of video content to identify and index action segments before user viewing or retrieval. By pre-processing the video to detect and mark action occurrences, the system eliminates the need for manual searching and enables rapid retrieval of desired segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs video analysis, action detection, and segment indexing without requiring manual user intervention. The automated action recognition system serves itself to identify and organize video content, freeing users from tedious manual searching and indexing tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If existing automatic systems process all frames for action recognition, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but processing efficiency decreases to about 500 frames per second

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction detection accuracyVSAvoidframe processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action processing by analyzing only a subset of frames that are most likely to contain actions rather than processing every frame exhaustively. By applying action detection selectively to frames with higher probability of containing athletic actions, the system maintains detection accuracy while improving processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing quality levels to different frames based on their likelihood of containing actions. Frames identified as potentially containing actions receive full detailed analysis, while other frames receive minimal or no processing. This local differentiation of processing quality optimizes the balance between detection accuracy and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12579843B2Method and system of image processing for action classification
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 INTEL CORP
  • US12579843B2 patent drawing
  • US12579843B2 patent drawing
  • US12579843B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system of image processing for action classification uses fine-grained motion-attributes.