Action Selection Rule Generation for Technical System Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex technical systems like gas turbines and wind turbines often rely on computer-aided control methods using neural networks for action selection rules, which result in high complexity, making them difficult for human experts to interpret and understand, leading to suboptimal control due to lack of comprehensibility.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to generate and select action selection rules with lower complexity by assigning a complexity measure and evaluating them based on distance, reward, and quality measures, using techniques like genetic programming and particle swarm optimization, ensuring the rules are understandable and effective for control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex regression methods such as neural networks are used to determine action selection rules, then the optimality of control is improved, but the complexity of the action selection rule increases making it incomprehensible to human experts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of controlVSAvoidcomplexity of action selection rule
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the action selection process by separating the complex neural network evaluation (performed offline to generate training data) from the actual control decision-making (performed online using simplified rules). This allows the complex computations to be done once during training while the operational system uses comprehensible, simple rules for real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy or approximation of the optimal control policy derived from complex neural networks. Instead of using the full complex model for operational decisions, it generates training data from the complex model and uses this to train simpler action selection rules that replicate the essential control behavior while remaining comprehensible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If simpler regression methods or low-dimensional state representations are used, then the complexity of the action selection rule is reduced for better comprehensibility, but the optimality of control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of action selection ruleVSAvoidoptimality of control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by using complex neural networks offline to generate high-quality training data before deploying the simplified control system. This preliminary computation phase captures the optimal control behavior, which is then encoded into simpler rules that can be executed efficiently during operation without sacrificing control quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces training data as an intermediary between the complex neural network and the simple action selection rules. The complex model generates training data that serves as a bridge, allowing the simple rules to learn optimal control strategies without directly containing the complexity of the neural network architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If complex action selection rules are generated using neural networks, then the control performance is optimized, but the ease of operation decreases due to lack of comprehensibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidcomprehensibility for human experts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into two distinct parts: an offline training phase using complex neural networks to generate optimal control data, and an online execution phase using simple, comprehensible rules. This segmentation allows high control performance to be achieved during training while maintaining ease of operation during actual control execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical/neural network-based complex decision-making system with a simpler rule-based system for operational use. The complex neural network is replaced by simplified action selection rules that are easier for human experts to understand and operate, while maintaining control performance through careful training data generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2943841B1Method for the computerized control and/or regulation of a technical system
Publication Date: 2019.08.28 SIEMENS AG
  • EP2943841B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2943841B1 patent drawing
  • EP2943841B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a method for the computerized control and/or regulation of a technical system. Within the context of the method according to the invention, an action-selection rule (PO') is determined which has a low level of complexity and yet is well suited to the regulating and/or control of the technical system, there being used for determination of the action-selection rule (PO') an evaluation measure (EM) which is determined on the basis of a distance measure and/or a reward measure and/or an action-selection rule evaluation method. The action-selection rule is then used to control and/or regulate the technical system. The method according to the invention has the advantage of the action-selection rule being comprehensible to a human expert. Preferably, the method according to the invention is used for regulating and/or controlling a gas turbine and/or a wind turbine.