Activated Carbon with Homogeneous Metal Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing spherical activated carbon with catalytic activity are costly and inefficient, requiring post-production impregnation with metal catalysts, which is inconvenient and leads to non-homogeneous distribution and reduced adsorption capacity.

Innovation Solution

Intertropolymerization of metals into carbonaceous organic polymers during their formation, followed by carbonization and activation, allowing for homogeneous metal loading throughout the activated carbon structure, reducing production time and metal requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If post-production impregnation with metal catalysts is used, then catalytic activity is achieved, but metal distribution is non-homogeneous and adsorption capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidmetal distribution homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating metal catalysts into the polymer matrix during the polymerization process, before carbonization and activation. This ensures homogeneous metal distribution throughout the activated carbon structure, eliminating the non-homogeneous distribution problem associated with post-production impregnation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the catalyst incorporation step with the polymer synthesis step. By combining metal salt addition with polymerization in a single process sequence, the metal catalysts become uniformly distributed within the polymer matrix before carbonization, avoiding the need for separate impregnation steps and preventing adsorption capacity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If post-production impregnation is used, then catalytic activity is achieved, but production time is extended and metal usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs catalyst incorporation during polymerization, completing the catalytic function preparation before carbonization and activation. This eliminates the need for separate impregnation and drying steps, significantly reducing production time while maintaining catalytic activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple process steps (catalyst addition, polymerization, and catalyst incorporation) into a single integrated process. This merging of operations reduces the number of discrete steps, decreases production time, and lowers metal usage by achieving uniform distribution during synthesis rather than requiring excess metal for post-impregnation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If conventional impregnation methods are used, then catalytic function is added, but adsorption capacity is reduced due to pore blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic functionVSAvoidadsorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates metal catalysts during polymerization, distributing them throughout the polymer matrix before carbonization. This preliminary incorporation ensures that metals are uniformly dispersed at the molecular level, preventing pore blockage and preserving adsorption capacity while still providing catalytic function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves local quality by distributing metal catalysts uniformly throughout the polymer matrix at the molecular level during polymerization. This localized, homogeneous distribution ensures catalytic activity throughout the material while preventing localized pore blockage, maintaining both catalytic function and adsorption capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in activated carbon with enhanced catalytic activity and improved protection against both chemical and biological poisons, with reduced energy consumption and metal usage, achieving superior performance compared to conventionally impregnated activated carbon.

Implementation Method 1

carbonaceous organic polymers into which, in the course of their formation (i.e. their production or synthesis, respectively), at least one metal, preferably in the form of a metal atom and/or of a metal ion, has been interpolymerized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterpolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

carbonization and subsequent activation of carbonaceous organic polymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonization: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

carbonization and subsequent activation of carbonaceous organic polymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActivation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

activated carbon has fairly unspecific adsorptive properties and therefore is the most widely used adsorbent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20160016806A1Activated carbon having catalytic activity
Publication Date: 2016.01.21 BLUCHER GMBH

AI summary

The invention refers to a process for producing activated carbon having catalytic activity by carbonization and subsequent activation of carbonaceous organic polymers, wherein carbonaceous organic polymers into which, in the course of their formation, at least one metal atom and/or metal ion has been interpolymerized are subjected to a carbonization and subsequent activation, forming an activated carbon loaded with the metal atom and/or metal ion. This obviates subsequent loading with the metal by costly and inconvenient impregnation after the activated carbon has been produced. By endowing the starting materials with the metal, moreover, a more homogeneous loading is achieved, and that homogeneous throughout all kinds of pores (i.e. macropores, mesopores and micropores), so that catalytic activity is enhanced, and in addition, activation is accelerated.