Activated-Release Fertilizer Coating for Nitrogen Leaching Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fertilizer, pesticide, and seed technologies rely on soil moisture and temperature for nutrient release and germination, leading to inefficiencies and environmental issues like nitrate leaching and phosphorus unavailability, as well as limitations in application timing and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A water-insoluble or slowly-soluble coating that can be activated by external stimuli such as electronic pulses, microwaves, or specific chemicals, allowing for precise control over the release of active ingredients in fertilizers, pesticides, and seed germination, independent of soil conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional water-soluble fertilizers are applied to soil, then plants can access nutrients quickly, but nitrogen is lost through leaching and denitrification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutrient availability to plantsVSAvoidnitrogen loss through leaching and denitrification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

A polymer coating is applied to the fertilizer granules to control the release rate of nutrients. The coating acts as a flexible barrier that regulates water penetration and nutrient dissolution, preventing premature release and reducing leaching losses while maintaining plant availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The solubility parameters of the fertilizer are modified by incorporating solubility modifiers into the polymer coating. These modifiers change the coating's permeability characteristics, allowing controlled release of nutrients in response to environmental conditions such as soil moisture and temperature, thereby reducing nitrogen loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fertilizer nitrogen is managed to reduce environmental impact, then leaching and denitrification are reduced, but crop productivity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impact from nitrate leaching and denitrificationVSAvoidcrop yield and nutrient availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fertilizer coating is designed to dynamically adjust its permeability based on environmental conditions. The coating becomes more permeable when soil moisture and temperature conditions favor plant uptake, and less permeable when conditions favor loss pathways, thereby maintaining productivity while reducing environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The coating system responds to feedback from soil conditions (moisture, temperature) to regulate nutrient release rates. This feedback mechanism ensures nutrients are released when plants can utilize them effectively, maintaining crop productivity while minimizing losses to the environment through leaching and denitrification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of substance

If farmers apply fertilizer at the best time to minimize loss, then nitrogen loss is reduced, but timing flexibility is limited by weather and soil conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrogen lossVSAvoidapplication timing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fertilizer coating performs the timing function autonomously based on environmental conditions. Once applied, the coating self-regulates nutrient release in response to soil moisture and temperature, eliminating the need for precise application timing decisions by farmers and providing flexibility in when fertilizer can be applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controlled-release coating is applied in advance to the fertilizer granules before field application. This preliminary action embeds the timing control mechanism within the fertilizer itself, allowing farmers to apply fertilizer without concern for immediate loss risks, as the coating will regulate release based on subsequent environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of substance

If existing coatings are applied to urea to slow dissolution, then leaching and volatilization are reduced, but the coatings increase fertilizer cost and do not fully address environmental needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurea loss through leaching and volatilizationVSAvoidcoating cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coating system uses a composite polymer formulation that combines multiple materials with complementary functions. This composite structure provides enhanced durability, controlled permeability, and cost-effectiveness compared to single-material coatings, while addressing both loss reduction and environmental concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The polymer coating is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: controlling dissolution rate, reducing leaching, minimizing volatilization, and potentially responding to environmental stimuli. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple separate treatments and additives, simplifying the overall system and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This technology enables flexible and timely release of nutrients and pesticides, reducing environmental impact and improving crop yields by allowing farmers to apply fertilizers and pesticides when needed, and initiating germination under optimal conditions, thus enhancing agricultural productivity and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A water-insoluble or slowly-soluble coating that can be activated by external stimuli

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater insolubility:

Implementation Method 2

A water-insoluble or slowly-soluble coating that can be activated by external stimuli such as electronic pulses, microwaves, or specific chemicals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrowave radiation: Microwave Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS9078393B1Activated-release fertilizer, pesticides, and other granules, germination-activated seeds, and methods of making and using same
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 ACTIVATION TECH
  • US9078393B1 patent drawing
  • US9078393B1 patent drawing
  • US9078393B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An activated-release, water-insoluble or slowly-soluble coating is utilized on fertilizers, pesticides, seeds, medicine, and other granules to precisely time the release of the active ingredient of the granules, for purposes such as fertilizer and pesticide release as well as to initiate seed germination. An external stimulus, or activating agent, including, but not limited to, microwaves, ultrasonic waves, X-rays, radio waves, electromagnetic waves, radar waves, sonar waves, magnetic induction, (or pulses of any of the foregoing), specific chemical, bacteria, or fungus organism (such as ionic or non ionic surfactants, organic solvents, specifically cultured bacteria, fungi or catalytic agents) is used to break the coating, thus allowing for the release or germination. An activating device may be mounted on or in a tool bar, cart, or other apparatus pulled by a tractor, all-terrain vehicle (ATV), airplane, helicopter, or other implement and passed over a field, sprayed onto or injected into the soil, when the granule content is actually needed or germination is sought. The present disclosure also relates to liquid fertilizers of complex chemistry that are not readily available to plants; activation will degrade the nutrient compounds to readily-available forms.