Active Aerodynamic Control for Vehicle Tractive Effort

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle aerodynamic systems lack active control mechanisms to adjust downforce in response to operational conditions, leading to suboptimal tractive effort and stability during acceleration, cornering, and braking.

Innovation Solution

An active aerodynamic control system that determines and adjusts downforce on vehicle wheels based on real-time parameters such as tire properties, wheel slip, and vehicle speed, using moveable spoilers and sensors to optimize tractive effort and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If passive aerodynamic features are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different operational conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to operational conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by transitioning from fixed passive aerodynamic features to actively adjustable features. The aerodynamic elements can change their configuration in real-time based on vehicle operating conditions such as speed, acceleration, and handling requirements, enabling the system to adapt downforce levels dynamically rather than being static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If active aerodynamic features are added, then adaptability to operational conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to operational conditionsVSAvoidaerodynamic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the universality principle by designing an integrated control system that manages multiple aerodynamic features across different vehicle zones (front, rear, sides) through a single control architecture. This multi-functional approach allows one system to handle various operational modes including acceleration, braking, and cornering scenarios, reducing overall system complexity despite the presence of multiple active elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Force

If downforce is increased to improve traction, then tractive effort is improved, but vehicle drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetractive effortVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the local quality principle by enabling independent control of downforce at different locations on the vehicle. Rather than uniformly increasing downforce across all aerodynamic surfaces, the system can apply downforce selectively to specific wheels or vehicle zones where it is most needed for traction, thereby minimizing overall drag while maintaining necessary tractive effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Force

If traction control is applied through brake pressure, then tractive effort is controlled, but energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetractive effort controlVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the mechanics substitution principle by replacing the traditional mechanical brake-based traction control system with an aerodynamic-based system. Instead of using friction brakes to control wheel slip and tractive effort, the system uses adjustable aerodynamic downforce to influence wheel grip and traction, thereby reducing energy loss associated with brake intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances vehicle stability and acceleration by dynamically controlling downforce, reducing the need for brake interventions and engine torque reductions, thereby improving traction and handling performance.

Implementation Method 1

aerodynamic downforce that acts on the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic downforce: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

aerodynamic drag force or an aerodynamic downforce

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10246139B2Method and apparatus for controlling vehicle tractive effort
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10246139B2 patent drawing
  • US10246139B2 patent drawing
  • US10246139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-wheeled vehicle employing an active aerodynamic control system is described. A method for controlling the vehicle and the active aerodynamic control system includes determining states of parameters related to ride and handling of the vehicle, and determining a current tractive effort based upon the states of parameters related to ride and handling of the vehicle. A desired tractive effort is determined based upon an operator desired acceleration, and an available tractive effort is determined based upon an available downforce transferable to the wheels from the active aerodynamic control system and downforces of the wheels. The active aerodynamic control system controls the downforce on one of the wheels to control the current tractive effort responsive to the desired tractive effort.