Active Bridge Native Interconnects for Low-Latency Chiplet Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional microelectronic devices face performance limitations due to high latency and space constraints, as chiplets are often connected to microchips using standard interfaces that require significant space and result in increased defects with larger die areas, leading to reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

The use of active bridges with native interconnects and direct bonding techniques to couple microchips and chiplets, allowing for a finer pitch and reduced latency by moving interfaces closer to processors and eliminating the need for standard interfacing protocols, thereby increasing speed and freeing up space for additional circuitry and functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If standard interfaces are used to connect chiplets to microchips, then compatibility and ease of integration are improved, but die area increases and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of integrationVSAvoiddie area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the standard interface protocol requirements from the connection between microchip and chiplet by introducing an active bridge die. The active bridge die assumes the role of the standard interface controller, allowing the microchip and chiplet to connect through simplified native interconnects without implementing full standard interface protocols, thereby reducing the required die area while maintaining compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The active bridge die acts as an intermediary component between the microchip and chiplet. It provides the necessary interface functionality and protocol handling while enabling direct native interconnects between the microchip and chiplet, thus reducing the overall die area required compared to implementing standard interfaces directly on both components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If standard interfaces with level-shifting and signal amplification are implemented, then signal integrity is improved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the signal integrity management functions (level-shifting, signal amplification, ESD protection) from the microchip and chiplet designs and consolidates them into the active bridge die. This allows the microchip and chiplet to use simpler native interconnects while the active bridge die handles all signal conditioning requirements, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The active bridge die serves as an intermediary that manages signal integrity between the microchip and chiplet. It performs level-shifting, signal amplification, and ESD protection functions, allowing the connected components to use simpler interconnects without compromising signal quality, thus reducing interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If chiplets are mounted in side-by-side configuration around microchip periphery, then space utilization is improved, but connection latency increases due to longer connection paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidconnection latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the interconnect parameter from standard interface protocols to native interconnects with finer pitch when using active bridge dies. This parameter change enables shorter connection paths and reduced latency while maintaining the space-efficient side-by-side mounting configuration of chiplets around the microchip periphery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240258271A1Active bridging apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 ADEIA SEMICON TECH LLC
  • US20240258271A1 patent drawing
  • US20240258271A1 patent drawing
  • US20240258271A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques and mechanisms for coupling chiplets to microchips utilizing active bridges. The active bridges include circuits that provide various functions and capabilities that previously may have been located on the microchips and/or the chiplets. Furthermore, the active bridges may be coupled to the microchips and the chiplets via “native interconnects” utilizing direct bonding techniques. Utilizing the active bridges and the direct bonding techniques of the active bridges to the microchips and the chiplets, the pitch for the interconnects can be greatly reduced going from a pitch in the millimeters to a fine pitch that may be in a range of less than one micron to approximately five microns.