Active-by-Active Programmable Device SiP Bridge Cost Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern programmable devices, such as FPGAs, face increasing costs due to advanced process technology and overhead of programmability, making traditional monolithic architectures unsustainable for cost-sensitive applications. Additionally, existing system-in-package (SiP) solutions rely on expensive packaging techniques, limiting their benefits to high-end applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of an active-by-active programmable device using a system-in-package (SiP) architecture, which includes a programmable IC die and a companion IC die mounted on a package substrate. The programmable IC die features a programmable fabric without application circuitry, while the companion IC die includes application circuitry. A SiP bridge with conductive interconnects electrically couples the IO circuits between the two IC dies, enabling data aggregation and dispersal through aggregation and dispersal circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional monolithic architectures are used, then device functionality is integrated, but manufacturing cost increases due to advanced process technology requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into two separate IC dies: a programmable IC die containing the programmable fabric and SiP IO circuits, and a companion IC die containing the application circuitry. These dies are manufactured separately using different process technologies and then mounted together on a package substrate, eliminating the need for the entire device to be manufactured using expensive advanced process technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A package substrate serves as an intermediary component that mechanically and electrically connects the programmable IC die and the companion IC die. The substrate provides conductive interconnects that enable signal transmission between the two dies, allowing them to function as an integrated system while being manufactured separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If advanced packaging techniques are used, then device integration is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases due to expensive interposers and complex three-dimensional die stacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging costVSAvoidpackaging complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging approach is segmented into simpler components: two IC dies mounted side-by-side on a package substrate using conventional wire bonding or flip-chip techniques. This avoids the need for complex three-dimensional die stacking and expensive interposer substrates, reducing both cost and manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs cost-effective packaging materials and techniques, such as standard package substrates and conventional interconnect methods, replacing expensive advanced packaging components like interposers. This approach prioritizes cost-effectiveness over maximum integration density, making the solution suitable for cost-sensitive applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If all circuit blocks are included in a monolithic device, then device functionality is complete, but overhead of programmability increases cost for applications that do not require all features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidapplication flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device functionality is segmented between the programmable IC die and the companion IC die. The programmable fabric provides reconfigurability for applications requiring programmability, while the companion IC die contains fixed application circuitry for applications that don't need full programmability. This allows the system to be configured appropriately for different application needs without paying for unnecessary features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the system have different levels of programmability: the programmable IC die provides full programmability where needed, while the companion IC die provides fixed functionality where programmability is not required. This local differentiation of quality allows cost optimization by providing programmability only where it is actually needed in the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUSRE50370E1Active-by-active programmable device
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 XILINX INC
  • USRE50370E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50370E1 patent drawing
  • USRE50370E1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example integrated circuit (IC) system includes a package substrate having a programmable integrated circuit (IC) and a companion IC mounted thereon, the programmable IC including a programmable fabric and the companion IC including application circuitry. The IC system further includes a system-in-package (SiP) bridge including a first SiP IO circuit disposed in the programmable IC, a second SiP IO circuit disposed in the companion IC, and conductive interconnect on the package substrate electrically coupling the first SiP IO circuit and the second SiP IO circuit. The IC System further includes first aggregation and first dispersal circuits in the programmable IC coupled between the programmable fabric and the first SiP IO circuit. The IC system further includes second aggregation and second dispersal circuits in the companion IC coupled between the application circuitry and the second SiP IO circuit.