Active Cascode Backgate Control for Low-Voltage VGS Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional active cascode circuits face limitations in controlling the gate-to-source voltage (VGS) without altering device geometry or changing drain current, which affects voltage headroom and bandwidth in low-voltage designs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control circuit that adjusts the backgate voltage of transistors to control the VGS, allowing for independent optimization of input voltage without altering device geometry or changing drain current, thereby enhancing bandwidth and output impedance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional active cascode circuits are used, then the circuit structure is simple, but the control of gate-to-source voltage (VGS) is limited and cannot be independently optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibility of VGSVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the gate control function into two independent controls: the main gate (receiving bias voltage) and the backgate (receiving adjustable control voltage). This segmentation allows independent optimization of VGS without altering device geometry or changing drain current, directly resolving the contradiction between control flexibility and circuit simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds another dimension of control by utilizing the backgate terminal in addition to the conventional main gate. This additional control dimension enables independent adjustment of VGS while maintaining the original circuit topology, achieving enhanced adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If device geometry is altered to change VGS, then VGS can be controlled, but the drain current changes and device characteristics are modified

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVGS controlVSAvoiddrain current stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the control functions into main gate (for bias) and backgate (for adjustment), the invention enables VGS control without modifying device geometry. The drain current remains stable because the segmentation allows independent control of VGS while maintaining consistent current characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from device geometry (W/L ratio) to electrical parameter (backgate voltage). This allows continuous adjustment of VGS through voltage control without altering physical device dimensions, ensuring drain current stability while achieving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If drain current is changed to control VGS, then VGS can be adjusted, but the output impedance and bandwidth are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVGS adjustabilityVSAvoidbandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the control approach from modifying drain current to applying backgate voltage. This parameter change allows VGS adjustment while maintaining optimal drain current levels, thereby preserving bandwidth and output impedance characteristics while achieving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The backgate control mechanism provides an additional feedback path for VGS adjustment. By monitoring and adjusting the backgate voltage, the circuit can optimize VGS while maintaining stable drain current and bandwidth, resolving the contradiction between adjustability and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If device geometry is modified to optimize VGS, then VGS control is achieved, but additional manufacturing steps and precision requirements are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVGS control capabilityVSAvoiddevice fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from geometric parameter modification (W/L ratio changes requiring additional fabrication steps) to electrical parameter control (backgate voltage application). This change enables VGS control capability without introducing additional manufacturing complexity or precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The backgate control mechanism uses the existing transistor structure with an additional control terminal, rather than creating modified device geometries. This approach copies the standard transistor fabrication process while adding control functionality, avoiding additional manufacturing steps and precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides improved control over voltage headroom and increased bandwidth and output impedance for active cascode circuits, particularly in low-voltage designs, by offering additional degrees of freedom in setting VGS through backgate control.

Implementation Method 1

a control circuit having a control output coupled to the backgate of the second transistor. The control circuit may be configured to provide a voltage on the backgate of the second transistor to control the VGS of the first transistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackgate control effect:

Data Source

PatentEP2779437B1Active cascode circuit using backgate control
Publication Date: 2019.09.25 ANALOG DEVICES INC
  • EP2779437B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2779437B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2779437B1 patent drawingFigure 4A

AI summary

An example embodiment of an active cascode circuit has a control circuit for control of the gate to source voltage (VGS) of at least one transistor in the active cascode circuit. The embodiment may be configured so that control of the VGS also controls the voltage Vin on the input. Vin may be adjusted without altering the device geometry or changing the drain current. This allows for better control and optimization of available headroom for the input voltage in low voltage designs and also results in higher active cascode circuit bandwidth and/or higher output impedance (Rout) for a given power level.