Active Chair Joint with Force-Dependent Elastic Gap Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing active-dynamic pendulum chairs lack optimal safety, mobility, restoring force, and manufacturability, leading to potential health issues from prolonged static sitting and limited movement range, while also being costly and having a short service life.

Innovation Solution

A joint arrangement featuring a hollow-cylindrical receiving cylinder with deformable elastic elements between conically tapering outer and inner wall sections, allowing force-dependent actuation and shape change, which reduces the bearing gap and increases deformation with user weight, limiting deflection and enhancing ergonomic support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid connection is used between base and intermediate section, then structural stability is improved, but active dynamic movement capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmovement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by replacing the rigid connection with a dynamic pendulum joint that allows controlled movement. The intermediate section is connected to the base via a pendulum mechanism that enables active dynamic movement while maintaining structural stability through a defined range of motion and restoring force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a pendulum joint with large bearing gap is used, then movement range is improved, but structural stability and safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement rangeVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the bearing gap dimensions to specific ranges (first radial gap: 2-10mm, second radial gap: 1-5mm) and configuring the conical surfaces with specific angles (5-15 degrees). These parameter optimizations ensure adequate movement range while maintaining structural stability and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex pendulum joint design is used to improve safety and mobility, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and mobilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the pendulum joint into modular components: outer joint shell, inner joint shell, receiving cylinder, and elastic elements. This modular segmentation enables independent manufacturing and assembly of each component, simplifying production while ensuring reliable performance through proper component interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses elastic elements as intermediary components between the conical surfaces to provide the restoring force. This intermediary approach simplifies the overall design by using a simple elastic element rather than a complex spring mechanism, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Force

If conical surfaces with large angle are used, then restoring force is improved, but movement range deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestoring forceVSAvoidmovement range
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the conical surface angle parameter to a specific range (5-15 degrees) to achieve the optimal balance between restoring force and movement range. This parameter optimization ensures that the elastic elements generate adequate restoring force while allowing sufficient pendulum movement for active dynamic sitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides safe, varied, and defined movement range with improved ergonomic support, increased durability, and cost-effective production, reducing the risk of health issues associated with static sitting.

Implementation Method 1

The movable mounting of the receiving cylinder (20) is realized by means of deformable elastic elements (50), which are arranged in a bearing gap (60) between an outer wall section (21, 22) of the receiving cylinder (20) and an inner wall section (41, 42) of the joint shell (40), and the receiving cylinder (20) can be actuated in a force-dependent manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4081072B1Chair and joint system for a chair or a seating apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.08.09 AERIS GMBH
  • EP4081072B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4081072B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4081072B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a joint arrangement (10) comprising a hollow-cylindrical accommodating cylinder (12), which extends in a cylinder-axis direction (Z), designed for accommodating one end of a column (30) of an active chair, wherein the latter is movably mounted in a substantially hollow-cylindrical outer joint shell (40), which is made up in two or more parts from joint-shell segments (45), wherein the movable mounting of the accommodating cylinder (20) is realized by means of deformable elastic elements (50) arranged dimensionally and positionally variably in a bearing gap (60) between a respective outer-wall portion (21, 22) of the accommodating cylinder (20) and an inner-wall portion (41, 42) of the joint shell (40), and the accommodating cylinder (20) can be actuated force-dependently, as result of which the shape and/or position of the elastic elements (50) changes in that the size of the bearing gap (60) changes, preferably decreases, in a radial direction (Rs) when the accommodating cylinder (20) is actuated in a cylinder-axis direction (Z).