Active Data Generation Using Prediction Error and Uncertainty

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data generation methods for AI are time-consuming, costly, and lack sufficient coverage of the desired data space, relying on human expertise without considering the reliability of predictions, particularly for 0/1 error measures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving training a first predictor, determining its prediction error and uncertainty, and using a second predictor to generate data points that maximize a combination of expected prediction error and uncertainty, ensuring optimal data space coverage and reducing manual effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing data generation methods are used to maximize prediction error, then new data can be generated, but the method is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata generation efficiencyVSAvoidtime for data generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the predictor itself to identify which data points should be generated. The predictor automatically determines its own weaknesses by evaluating prediction errors and uncertainties, eliminating the need for external expert intervention in selecting training data points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The method implements a feedback loop where the predictor's performance is continuously evaluated, and the identified weak points are used to generate new training data. This closed-loop system automatically improves the predictor by feeding back information about its own prediction errors and uncertainties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If existing data generation methods are used, then data can be generated, but sufficient coverage of the desired data space cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata space coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly sampling the data space, the method focuses computational resources on specific local regions where the predictor exhibits high uncertainty or large prediction errors. This targeted approach ensures that data generation occurs precisely where it is most needed to improve prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The data generation process is dynamic and adaptive, continuously adjusting which regions of the data space require new data points based on the predictor's current performance. As the predictor improves, the focus of data generation shifts to new challenging regions, ensuring comprehensive coverage over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If expert selection of data points is used, then data quality can be maintained, but manual work is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction qualityVSAvoidmanual effort required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The predictor automatically identifies its own training needs by evaluating its prediction errors and uncertainties, eliminating the need for expert intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously determining which data points would be most beneficial for training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The uncertainty estimator acts as an intermediary between the predictor and the data generation process. It translates the predictor's performance into actionable insights about where new data should be generated, automating what previously required expert judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If 0/1 error measures are used, then simple error classification is achieved, but the degree of error cannot be indicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror measurement capabilityVSAvoiderror measurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method transitions from using simple 0/1 error classification to employing continuous uncertainty measures. This parameter change allows for nuanced differentiation of prediction quality, enabling the system to identify not just whether a prediction is wrong, but how uncertain the predictor is about its prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3980850B1Active data generation taking uncertainties into consideration
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • EP3980850B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3980850B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3980850B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for generating data on the basis of data already available having individual annotated data points, the method comprising: - training a first predictor on the basis of data already available; - determining a prediction error of the first predictor for each data point; - training a second predictor to determine an anticipated prediction error of the first predictor and an uncertainty; - determining a data description which maximizes a combination of anticipated prediction error and uncertainty; and - generating data on the basis of the previously determined data description.