Active Debridement Wound Dressing Pneumatic Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The presence of debris such as biofilms, necrotic tissue, and foreign bodies at tissue sites impedes healing and reduces the effectiveness of treatments by preventing them from reaching the site, increasing healing times and infection risks, necessitating an effective method for continuous debridement without user intervention.

Innovation Solution

An active debridement wound dressing with a wound interface layer featuring an abrasive surface and an active layer comprising a pneumatic structure that expands and collapses in response to pressure, mechanically disrupting debris, coupled with a control unit to manage pneumatic pressure and ensure continuous debridement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual debridement is performed by user intervention, then debris removal effectiveness is improved, but treatment continuity is reduced due to intermittent user presence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris removal effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The wound dressing system performs debridement automatically through pneumatic actuation of the active layer, eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention. The system serves itself by using integrated pressure-sensitive materials and pneumatic structures that autonomously generate mechanical motion to disrupt and remove debris from the wound bed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The active layer transitions from a static state to a dynamic state through pneumatic pressure application, enabling continuous mechanical debridement motion. The pressure-sensitive material changes its physical state in response to pressure variations, creating oscillating motion that continuously disrupts debris without requiring repeated manual application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If passive wound dressings are used, then user intervention frequency is reduced, but debridement effectiveness is insufficient for active debris removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intervention frequencyVSAvoiddebridement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wound dressing incorporates pneumatic structures including pressure-sensitive materials and pneumatic chambers that respond to pressure variations. When negative pressure is applied through the drape layer, the pneumatic structures expand and contract, generating mechanical motion in the abrasive layer to actively disrupt and remove debris while maintaining ease of operation through automated pressure-driven actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The active layer utilizes pressure-sensitive materials that change their physical properties in response to applied pressure. This parameter change enables the material to transition between different states, creating mechanical motion that enhances debridement effectiveness while the system remains easy to operate through external pressure application alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If continuous mechanical debridement is implemented, then healing time is reduced, but device complexity increases due to automated mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealing timeVSAvoidautomated mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The active layer serves multiple functions: it provides the abrasive surface for debridement, acts as a pressure-sensitive actuator, and functions as part of the wound interface. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate automated mechanisms while enabling continuous mechanical debridement to reduce healing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pneumatic structures utilize flexible thin films and pressure-sensitive materials that can be integrated into the wound dressing layers. These flexible components enable automated mechanical motion through pressure variations without requiring complex rigid mechanisms, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining continuous debridement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Productivity

If pneumatic structures are integrated into the wound dressing, then continuous debridement motion is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous debridement motionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The pneumatic structure is divided into discrete chambers and pressure-sensitive zones within the active layer. This segmentation allows for modular manufacturing of individual pneumatic elements that can be assembled into the complete wound dressing, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while enabling continuous debridement motion through coordinated pneumatic actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables continuous, active mechanical debridement of tissue sites, reducing healing times and infection risks by effectively removing debris without requiring constant user intervention, enhancing the efficacy of treatments and improving tissue site access for therapeutic agents.

Implementation Method 1

The active layer includes a pneumatic structure configured to expand and collapse responsive to a pneumatic pressure applied to the active layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The expansion and collapse of the pneumatic structure causes the wound interface layer to move relative to the wound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

The wound interface layer includes an abrasive surface configured to contact a wound and mechanically debride the wound when the wound interface layer moves relative to the wound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 4

The wound interface layer includes an abrasive surface configured to contact a wound and mechanically debride the wound when the wound interface layer moves relative to the wound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12178687B2Method and system for providing active tissue site debridement
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US12178687B2 patent drawing
  • US12178687B2 patent drawing
  • US12178687B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wound debridement system includes a wound dressing having an active layer (40) and a wound interface layer (10). The active layer is formed from one or more pneumatic members (45). The pneumatic members are arranged about a film layer (60), by which the pneumatic members are attached to the wound interface layer. A control unit (80) controls a drive unit (70) to intermittently apply pressure to the pneumatic members of the active layer. The pressure applied by the drive unit causes the pneumatic members to expand and contract. This movement of the pneumatic members is transferred to the wound interface layer, causing the wound interface layer to move relative to a tissue site to which the wound dressing is applied. The wound interface layer may be formed having an abrasive wound-facing surface, such that the movement of the wound interface layer causes a mechanical disruption and debridement of debris at the tissue site.