Active Demand Management for EV Charging and Peak Load Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy management systems struggle to dynamically manage energy demand in residential and commercial settings, particularly with the increasing penetration of electric vehicles, as they often rely on rigid rules and fail to anticipate sudden increases in demand, leading to potential overloads and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

An active demand management system that uses a cloud-based platform to dynamically prioritize and manage energy distribution across networked devices, including electric vehicles, by forecasting demand based on historical data, real-time smart meter data, and user inputs, adjusting device priorities in real-time to maintain energy efficiency and user comfort without requiring physical infrastructure upgrades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rigid rules are used for demand management, then system simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot anticipate sudden demand increases leading to overloads and inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemand management reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic demand management by transitioning from rigid static rules to adaptive algorithms that continuously adjust device priorities based on real-time conditions. The system dynamically forecasts demand, identifies at-risk devices, and modifies operational parameters on-the-fly to prevent overloads while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by forecasting energy demand before actual consumption occurs. It proactively identifies devices at risk of causing overloads and adjusts their priorities or operational parameters in advance, preventing rather than merely reacting to demand issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If real-time dynamic control is implemented, then energy efficiency and responsiveness are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the demand management system automatically forecasts demand, identifies problematic devices, and adjusts priorities without requiring manual intervention or complex external control infrastructure. The system serves itself by using its own data and algorithms to optimize energy distribution in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where real-time energy consumption data is monitored, compared against forecasts, and used to dynamically adjust device priorities. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adaptation to changing conditions, improving efficiency while keeping control logic manageable through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If forecasted demand exceeds threshold, then devices must be powered off to prevent overload, but this reduces user convenience and comfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverload preventionVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating device priorities rather than applying uniform load shedding. Instead of powering off devices indiscriminately, the system selectively manages specific devices based on their individual priority levels, operational status, and contribution to forecasted demand, maintaining user convenience for high-priority devices while preventing overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by adjusting priorities of only those devices necessary to bring forecasted demand below thresholds. Rather than powering off all devices or making blanket restrictions, it applies targeted priority adjustments to specific at-risk devices, minimizing impact on user convenience while achieving overload prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240286515A1Active Demand Management Systems and Methods
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 RAINFOREST AUTOMATION INC
  • US20240286515A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286515A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286515A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Active demand management system and methods are disclosed herein. An example method for active demand management includes, facilitating dynamic and adaptive control of energy consumption within a network of devices. The method involves computing a rule set based on certain conditions, assessing the current operational state of devices, and integrating user inputs and preferences. By evaluating forecasted demand against a predetermined threshold, the method generates a control strategy to sequentially deactivate devices in order of prioritized importance, ensuring demand does not surpass the set threshold. Subsequently, energy-related commands are dispatched to the devices to implement the devised plan, optimizing energy distribution and preventing overload, thereby achieving efficient demand management.