Active Downforce Control Aligned With Driver Inputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current active downforce systems in vehicles often conflict with driver inputs, leading to 'out-of-phase' interactions due to differences in reaction time or opposing intentions, which can negatively impact vehicle performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for active downforce control that includes a controller to monitor driver inputs such as accelerator and brake pedal positions, steering wheel angle, and lateral acceleration, calculating an out-of-phase interaction index to adjust aerodynamic actuators accordingly, using a blended ride height formula to mitigate conflicts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active downforce systems are used to increase traction and improve vehicle performance, then vehicle handling and grip are improved, but out-of-phase interaction with driver inputs occurs causing conflicts in vehicle control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle handlingVSAvoiddriver control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver inputs (accelerator pedal position, brake pedal position, steering wheel angle, lateral acceleration) and uses this feedback to detect out-of-phase interactions. The controller compares driver intentions with active downforce system responses, adjusting the downforce application timing and magnitude to align with driver inputs, thereby resolving control conflicts while maintaining improved handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The active downforce system dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time detection of out-of-phase interactions. When conflicts are detected, the system modifies the downforce application characteristics (timing, magnitude, duration) to synchronize with driver inputs, transforming the system from a static performance-enhancing device to a dynamic control-adaptive system that maintains both handling performance and driver control authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If active downforce systems apply aerodynamic forces to improve acceleration and braking, then vehicle performance is enhanced, but conflicts arise when system actions oppose driver intentions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccelerationVSAvoiddriver intent alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors driver inputs including accelerator and brake pedal positions to understand driver intentions. When out-of-phase interactions are detected (where active downforce actions conflict with driver inputs), the feedback mechanism adjusts the downforce application to align with driver intent, ensuring that performance enhancement occurs in harmony with driver commands rather than in opposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects potential out-of-phase interactions before they fully manifest by monitoring driver inputs and predicting conflicting downforce applications. By identifying these conflicts in advance, the system can preemptively adjust the downforce control strategy to prevent opposing actions, thereby maintaining both enhanced power delivery and adaptability to driver intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Manufacturing precision

If aerodynamic actuators are precisely controlled to adjust downforce, then traction and cornering performance are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic element positioningVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it monitors driver inputs (accelerator, brake, steering), detects out-of-phase interactions, calculates interaction indices, and controls aerodynamic actuators. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single control unit, the system achieves precise aerodynamic element positioning without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as the controller leverages existing sensor data and integrated processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260054781A1Driver-vehicle interaction for active downforce control
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20260054781A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054781A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054781A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for active downforce control for a vehicle may include determining an out-of-phase interaction index between a driver of the vehicle and a controller. The controller is configured to control one or more aerodynamic actuators. The method further may include determining one or more active downforce control inputs based at least in part on the out-of-phase interaction index. The method further may include controlling the one or more aerodynamic actuators based at least in part on the one or more active downforce control inputs.