Active Damping of Ear Canal Resonances in ANR Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing acoustic devices with active noise reduction capabilities struggle to effectively dampen audio signals at high frequencies (3,000-10,000 Hz) due to resonant modes of the ear canal, leading to an unnatural listening experience and variability in performance across different users.

Innovation Solution

Implementing modal control to target and dampen audio signals at resonant frequencies of the ear canal by using existing hardware components, such as microphones and output transducers, without requiring additional sensors in the ear canal, and combining this with broadband noise reduction for lower frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If broadband control is used to cancel audio signals, then audio cancellation is achieved across a wide frequency range, but the upper frequency limit is restricted to 1,000-2,000 Hz

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio cancellation effectivenessVSAvoidfrequency range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the frequency range into two segments: low frequencies (below 1,000-2,000 Hz) handled by broadband control and high frequencies (3,000-10,000 Hz) handled by modal control targeting resonant modes. This segmentation allows each control method to operate optimally within its designated frequency band, resolving the contradiction between broadband cancellation effectiveness and high frequency coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges broadband control and modal control into a unified active noise reduction system. The broadband control handles low frequency cancellation while modal control specifically targets high frequency resonant modes, creating a comprehensive solution that covers the entire audible spectrum effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If in-ear headphones are inserted into the user's ears, then noise reduction is provided, but the resonant frequencies shift substantially causing an unnatural listening experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction performanceVSAvoidlistening naturalness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of resonant frequency shifts and peaks into a benefit by using modal control to actively dampen these resonances. The same ear canal geometry that causes problematic resonances when headphones are inserted becomes the target for selective damping, allowing the system to maintain noise reduction performance while restoring natural listening quality by reducing the unnatural resonant peaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If additional microphones are inserted into the user's ear canal to measure audio response, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio response measurement accuracyVSAvoidhardware configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the existing output transducer as an intermediary to indirectly measure the audio response within the ear canal. Instead of inserting additional microphones, the system uses the transducer's known characteristics and the physics of resonant modes to infer the ear canal's resonant frequencies, thereby achieving measurement precision without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing hardware components (output transducer and existing microphones) to serve the dual purpose of audio output and resonant frequency measurement. The output transducer's interaction with the ear canal acoustics provides the measurement information needed for modal control, eliminating the need for additional dedicated measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves the listening experience by reducing noise at high frequencies and minimizing head-to-head variability, providing a more natural audio response and personalized noise reduction.

Implementation Method 1

The ear canals of many humans have one or more strong acoustic resonant modes (e.g., between 2,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz). However, when using an acoustic device such as an in-ear headphones that are inserted into the user's ears, the frequencies of the resonant modes for a particular user can shift substantially

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

actively damping the audio attributable to resonant modes of a user's ear canal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS12444399B2Active damping of resonant canal modes
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 BOSE CORP
  • US12444399B2 patent drawing
  • US12444399B2 patent drawing
  • US12444399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active noise reduction (ANR) device includes an acoustic transducer, a first sensor, and a second sensor. The acoustic transducer is configured to generate output audio. The first sensor is configured to capture audio originating from an external environment of the ANR device. The second sensor is configured to generate a signal indicative of (1) the audio originating from the external environment and (2) the output audio generated by the acoustic transducer. The output audio generated by the acoustic transducer is modified based on a portion of the signal generated by the second sensor, the portion being attributable to a resonant mode of a user's ear canal.