Active Filter Tuning Circuit for Accurate Corner Frequency Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional filter tuning methods on integrated circuits (ICs) face inaccuracies due to variations in manufacturing processes and operating conditions, leading to inconsistencies between replica and actual filters, and fail to account for amplifier transfer function variances and filter response delays, especially in high bandwidth applications.

Innovation Solution

A filter tuning circuit comprising a programmable component, a tuning signal generator, a comparator, and a feedback system that inputs test signals, compares outputs, and iteratively adjusts components to achieve a desired corner frequency, with a feedback network accounting for delays by performing the tuning process twice with different test signals and reference clocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If replica filter circuits are used for tuning, then tuning can be performed on the IC, but tuning inaccuracies occur due to inconsistencies between replica and actual filters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning accuracyVSAvoidconsistency between replica and actual filters
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a replica filter circuit that copies the structure and components of the actual filter to be tuned. By tuning the replica circuit, the tuning results are applied to the actual filter. This copying approach allows tuning to be performed indirectly while maintaining component consistency through matching design parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The replica filter circuit serves as an intermediary between the tuning process and the actual filter. The replica is tuned first, and its tuning results are transferred to the actual filter, acting as a mediator that enables indirect tuning while isolating the actual filter from direct manipulation during the tuning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If conventional tuning methods are used, then tuning can be performed, but amplifier transfer function variances are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorner frequency accuracyVSAvoidaccounting for amplifier variances
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a feedback mechanism where the output of the replica filter is fed back through a feedback network to the input. This feedback loop allows the system to account for amplifier transfer function variances by measuring the actual response and adjusting the tuning accordingly, ensuring accurate corner frequency tuning despite amplifier variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If single tuning process is used, then tuning is simple, but filter response delays are not compensated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning process complexityVSAvoiddelay compensation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs tuning in two separate stages: first tuning the replica filter circuit, then applying those results to tune the actual filter. This preliminary action of tuning the replica first allows the system to account for response delays by measuring and compensating for them in the replica before transferring tuning results to the actual filter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If filter components are made programmable, then filter characteristics can be adjusted, but manufacturing variations still cause frequency deviations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter programmabilityVSAvoidcomponent value consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses programmable filter components that allow adjustment of resistance and capacitance values. By changing these parameters through programming rather than fixed manufacturing values, the system can compensate for manufacturing variations and achieve accurate corner frequencies despite component inconsistencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8836416B2Tuning circuitry and method for active filters
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 ANALOG DEVICES INC
  • US8836416B2 patent drawing
  • US8836416B2 patent drawing
  • US8836416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention may include a filter with programmable components, a tuning signal generator, a comparator, and a feedback system. The tuning signal generator may input first and second test signals into the filter and the comparator may sample the output of the filter in response to each respective signal. The comparator may then compare the sampled outputs to predetermined values. In response to the comparator's output, the feedback system may vary the programmable components of the filter until the search of the programmable components is exhausted, yielding first and second tuning results. Finally, the feedback system may determine a final tuning result based on the first and second tuning results. Consequently, the filter's actual corner frequency may be within an acceptable range of a desired corner frequency.