Active Fish Sorting System Using Ultrasound Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fish-sorting systems in dragged fishing nets are not reliable in distinguishing and releasing fish of sizes smaller than the desired size, leading to unintended catches and potential harm to non-commercial fish.

Innovation Solution

A fish-sorting system equipped with detection devices (such as ultrasound sensors and cameras) that measure fish size and species, a processing unit for comparison, and a sorting device with a flap mechanism to actively retain larger fish and release smaller ones, ensuring only commercial fish are caught and non-target species are given a chance to survive.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive mesh-based sorting is used in the fishing net, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of size-based fish sorting deteriorates because small fish cannot reliably escape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of fish size sortingVSAvoidcomplexity of sorting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the passive mechanical mesh-based sorting system with an active electronic detection and control system. Distance sensors (optical, acoustic, or electromagnetic) detect fish size, and a control unit activates sorting mechanisms (flaps, gates, or water jets) to reliably sort fish by size, overcoming the limitations of passive mesh structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system between fish detection and physical sorting. The control unit processes sensor data and coordinates the activation of multiple sorting components, enabling reliable size-based separation while managing system complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If all caught fish are brought on board for sorting, then the measurement precision can be ensured, but the loss of time and productivity increases due to onboard sorting work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of fishing operationVSAvoidtime for onboard fish sorting
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs fish size detection and sorting decisions while the net is still in the water, before the catch is brought on board. This preliminary action eliminates the need for time-consuming onboard sorting operations, significantly improving productivity and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fishing net system performs its own sorting function autonomously in the water using integrated sensors and control mechanisms. The system sorts fish by size automatically without requiring subsequent manual intervention on board, making the fishing operation more efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If mesh width is increased to allow small fish escape, then the ease of operation improves, but the manufacturing precision of the net structure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of fish escapeVSAvoidprecision of mesh width construction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical mesh structure's sorting function with an active electronic detection and control system. This substitution allows the use of uniform mesh construction while achieving precise size-based sorting through sensors and controlled mechanisms, eliminating the need for variable mesh widths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces the risk of catching undesired fish by actively sorting fish, optimizing onboard work by preventing the sorting of non-commercial fish and enhancing their survival chances by not bringing them on board.

Implementation Method 1

the detection device may comprise one or more distance sensors... An ultrasound sensor may, for example, be selected as a distance sensor of this kind

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasound: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 2

an ultrasound sensor with doppler technique

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler Effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 3

the detection device may comprise one or more light sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9877466B2Fish-sorting system for sorting fish in a dragged fishing net
Publication Date: 2018.01.30 MARELEC FOOD TECH NV
  • US9877466B2 patent drawing
  • US9877466B2 patent drawing
  • US9877466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fish-sorting system for sorting fish in a dragged fishing net (1), wherein the fish are actively sorted by means of a detection device (2, 3) which detects at least one size of a fish to be sorted; a processing unit which compares the size detected by the detection means (2, 3) with the desired size; and a sorting device (4) which retains fish in the fishing net (1) of a size greater than the desired size and which releases fish of a size smaller than the desired size from the fishing net (1) on the basis of the comparison between the detected size and the desired size carried out by the processing unit.