Active Gate Drive Circuit for IGBT Switching Slope Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gate driver technologies for IGBTs face challenges in minimizing switching losses, controlling current and voltage slopes, and ensuring electromagnetic compatibility, often resulting in excessive losses or delays due to open-loop control and missing compensation for non-linearities and dependencies on operating points.

Innovation Solution

A single PI controller is used to dynamically control both collector current and collector-to-emitter voltage slopes during turn-on and turn-off, employing simple hardware and feedback loops to manage state transitions and minimize losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If additional passive components (gate resistance, Miller capacitance, gate-emitter capacitance) are inserted into the circuit to adjust switching speed, then current and voltage slopes are reduced, but switching losses increase and gate driving losses increase due to larger gate charge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback control system that measures the actual collector current and collector-emitter voltage slopes during switching transitions and dynamically adjusts the gate drive signal to achieve target slopes. This feedback mechanism eliminates the need for excessive passive components while maintaining precise control over switching characteristics, thereby reducing both switching losses and gate driving losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of gate drive parameters during switching transitions rather than using fixed passive components. The gate resistance and drive voltage are dynamically modified based on real-time measurement of switching state and required slope correction, enabling optimal switching performance across varying operating conditions without the penalties of static component approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If open-loop control topologies are used to adjust gate current, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to compensate for non-linearities and operating point dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit complexityVSAvoidcurrent and voltage slope control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control that continuously measures actual collector current and voltage slopes during switching transitions and dynamically adjusts gate drive parameters to achieve precise target slopes. This feedback mechanism compensates for IGBT non-linearities, temperature variations, and operating point dependencies, maintaining high control precision without requiring excessively complex circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If switchable or adjustable gate resistors and current sources are used to influence gate current, then current slope control is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional complex detection and selection circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent slope control precisionVSAvoiddetection and selection circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple control functions into a unified feedback control architecture. The same control circuit that generates the basic gate drive signal also performs real-time measurement of switching state, calculation of required slope correction, and dynamic adjustment of gate parameters. This integration eliminates the need for separate detection and selection circuits while maintaining precise current slope control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of energy

If feed-forward gate voltage shape generator is used to adjust current slope, then gate driving losses are reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to small controllability of voltage slope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate driving lossesVSAvoidvoltage slope controllability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances the feed-forward approach by adding closed-loop feedback control. While the feed-forward generator provides initial gate voltage shaping to reduce gate driving losses, the feedback mechanism continuously measures actual voltage slope and dynamically adjusts gate drive parameters to achieve precise target voltage slope, thereby combining the advantages of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2615737B1Active gate drive circuit
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP2615737B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~4
  • EP2615737B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2615737B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A gate drive circuit and a method for controlling a gate-controlled component (30), the gate drive circuit comprising a PI controller (31) adapted to receive an input reference signal (vref,d/dt) and to control a gate voltage of the gate-controlled component. The gate drive circuit further comprises a first feedback loop for the PI controller (31) adapted to provide feedback from a time derivative of a collector-to-emitter voltage (vCE) of the controlled component (30), the first feedback loop comprising first gain (kv), a second feedback loop for the PI controller (31) adapted to provide feedback from the time derivative of the collector current (iC) of the controlled component (30), the second feedback loop comprising second gain (ki), wherein the second feedback loop comprises a clipping circuit (32) adapted to modify the feedback signal in the second feedback loop during turn-on of the controlled component (30) when the time derivative of the collector current is negative.