Active Gate Drive PI Control for IGBT Switching Slopes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gate driver technologies face challenges in minimizing switching losses and ensuring electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) for IGBTs due to limitations in controlling current and voltage slopes, particularly during turn-on and turn-off operations, and fail to accurately compensate for non-linearities and dependencies on operating points.

Innovation Solution

A single PI controller is used to simultaneously control both collector current and collector-to-emitter voltage slopes, employing active feedback loops and a simple hardware implementation to achieve highly dynamic control, with optional gate current control to prevent overshoots during switching transients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If additional passive components (gate resistance, Miller capacitance, gate-emitter capacitance) are inserted to adjust switching speed, then current and voltage slopes are reduced, but switching losses increase and gate driving losses increase due to larger gate charge needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control by measuring the actual collector current and collector-emitter voltage slopes and comparing them with reference values. The error signals are fed back to the gate driver through control amplifiers that adjust the gate current in real-time, enabling dynamic compensation without additional passive components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the gate driving parameters (gate current magnitude and duration) based on feedback signals. Instead of using fixed passive components, the gate driver adjusts its output parameters adaptively to achieve desired switching characteristics while minimizing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If additional passive components are inserted to control switching speed, then current and voltage slopes are reduced, but gate driving losses increase due to larger gate charge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidgate driving losses
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system monitors switching transients and adjusts gate driving parameters optimally, avoiding excessive gate charge delivery. This prevents energy waste in charging/discharging large capacitances that occurs with fixed passive component approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The gate driver transitions from a static configuration with fixed passive components to a dynamic system that continuously adjusts gate driving parameters based on real-time feedback, optimizing energy efficiency during switching transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If open-loop control topologies with adjustable gate resistors or current sources are used, then gate current can be influenced, but accurate current and voltage slopes are not achieved for all operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate current controlVSAvoidcurrent and voltage slope control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs closed-loop feedback that continuously measures actual switching parameters and adjusts gate driving to achieve precise current and voltage slopes. This compensates for variations in operating conditions (temperature, load current, DC voltage) that cause transconductance and capacitance changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects and compensates for its own performance deviations through feedback measurement and comparison with reference values, adjusting gate driving parameters to maintain optimal switching characteristics across all operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If open-loop control is used, then circuit complexity is reduced, but non-linearities and dependencies on operating point cannot be compensated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit complexityVSAvoidoperating point independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system compensates for IGBT non-linearities (transconductance variations, capacitance changes with voltage and temperature) by continuously measuring actual switching parameters and adjusting gate driving accordingly, ensuring reliable operation across all operating points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2816728B1Active gate drive circuit
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP2816728B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~4
  • EP2816728B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2816728B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A gate drive circuit and a method for controlling a gate-controlled component (30), the gate drive circuit comprising a PI controller (31) adapted to receive an input reference signal (vref,d/dt) and to control a gate voltage of the gate-controlled component. The gate drive circuit comprises a first feedback loop for the PI controller (31), the first feedback loop comprising first gain (kv), a second feedback loop for the PI controller (31), the second feedback loop comprising second gain (ki). The second feedback loop comprises a clipping circuit (32) adapted to modify a feedback signal in the second feedback loop during turn-on of the controlled component (30) when the time derivative of the collector current is negative and the first feedback loop comprises a first blanking circuit (101) adapted to cut the feedback loop when the controlled component is in a blocking state.