Active Gripping Sheet Pile Installation Mandrel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet piling systems face limitations in installation depth and material usage due to buckling deformation and passive gripping forces, which restrict the length of pile installation and require heavier piles than necessary.

Innovation Solution

An active gripping mechanism is integrated into the installation mandrel to engage and release sheet piles, allowing deeper installations with reduced damage and maintaining interlock integrity between adjacent piles, using a mandrel configuration that grips sheet piles along both sides and accommodates expansion for alignment and sealant application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If passive gripping is used to attach the piling to the mandrel, then the system is simpler to operate, but the installation depth is limited because skin friction exceeds passive gripping forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping mechanism simplicityVSAvoidinstallation depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping mechanism transitions from a static passive attachment to a dynamic active system that can apply and release gripping forces on demand, enabling deeper installations by overcoming skin friction through controlled active gripping forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces passive mechanical attachment relying on friction with an active mechanical gripping system that uses applied forces to secure the piling to the mandrel, allowing installation depths where skin friction would otherwise exceed attachment capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Length of stationary object

If the piling length is increased to achieve deeper installations, then the installation depth improves, but buckling deformation increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiling lengthVSAvoidbuckling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The active gripping mechanism applies preliminary securing forces to the piling before and during installation, preventing buckling deformation by maintaining structural support along the piling length, especially critical for longer piles where buckling risk increases exponentially

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If heavier piles are used to resist deformation during installation, then the structural stability improves, but the material usage and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation resistanceVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces reliance on increased piling weight and material strength with an active mechanical gripping system that provides the necessary structural support during installation, allowing the use of lighter, thinner piles that would otherwise be prone to buckling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the critical parameter from piling material strength and weight to active gripping force magnitude, allowing optimization of piling dimensions for final structural performance rather than installation resistance, thereby reducing material usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If corrugated profiles are used to provide structural rigidity, then the buckling resistance improves, but the manufacturing complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidprofile manufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The active gripping system replaces the need for corrugated profiles that provide rigidity through geometric complexity, allowing the use of simpler flat or smoother profiles that are easier and less expensive to manufacture while maintaining installation stability through active gripping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8753043B2Active gripping sheet piling installation system and method
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 CMI CO LTD
  • US8753043B2 patent drawing
  • US8753043B2 patent drawing
  • US8753043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for installing sheet piles using active gripping along side portions of the sheet piles. A sheet pile profile including first and second locking profiles and a gripping flange enables engagement of the sheet piles onto a mandrel for installation. Double engagement flanges on the locking profiles and an expandable connection between adjacent sheet piles provide improved resistance to fluid passage.