Active Head Restraint Four-Bar Linkage Impact Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle seat head restraints do not effectively translate to an impact position in response to forces imparted by occupants during impacts, potentially failing to adequately protect the occupant's head from injury.

Innovation Solution

An active head restraint system utilizing a four-bar linkage mechanism connected to a lumbar support mechanism, which actuates the head restraint forward and upward upon exceeding a predetermined force, providing a mechanical advantage to maintain the head restraint in the actuated position without additional locking mechanisms, and returns to the design position when the force is removed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional head restraint system is used, then the structure is simple, but the head restraint cannot effectively translate to an impact position during collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead restraint effectivenessVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The head restraint system transitions from a static structure to a dynamic mechanism that automatically adjusts position during impact. The four-bar linkage enables the head restraint to move from a retracted design position to an extended impact position in response to forces applied to the lumbar mechanism, providing active protection only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the impact force itself to trigger the protective action. When a collision occurs and force is applied to the lumbar mechanism, the four-bar linkage automatically translates this force into head restraint movement without requiring external sensors, controllers, or additional energy sources. The mechanism serves itself by converting the harmful impact force into a protective response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If additional locking mechanisms are added to maintain the head restraint in the actuated position, then the head restraint stability is improved, but the device complexity and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead restraint position stabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The four-bar linkage is designed with predetermined geometry that creates a self-locking effect at the impact position. The mechanical advantage built into the linkage geometry prevents the head restraint from returning to its design position once actuated, providing inherent stability without requiring additional locking components. The system prepares the structure in advance to resist reverse motion through its geometric configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex locking mechanisms (electromagnetic locks, mechanical latches, or hydraulic systems) with a purely geometric solution. The four-bar linkage's specific link lengths and pivot point locations create a stable equilibrium position that naturally maintains the head restraint in the extended position through mechanical advantage alone, eliminating the need for separate locking devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a four-bar linkage mechanism is implemented, then the head restraint translation effectiveness is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact response effectivenessVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The four-bar linkage mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the actuation mechanism for head restraint movement, provides the positioning system, creates the self-locking effect, and establishes the mechanical advantage ratio. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of components needed compared to using separate systems for each function, thereby simplifying manufacturing despite the sophisticated motion requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently translates the head restraint into a protective position during impacts, minimizing injury and reducing the number of components and overall mass of the vehicle seat, while maintaining the head restraint in the actuated position with minimal force, thus enhancing occupant safety.

Implementation Method 1

The active head restraint system utilizes a four-bar linkage mechanism connected to a lumbar support mechanism, which actuates the head restraint forward and upward upon exceeding a predetermined force, providing a mechanical advantage to maintain the head restraint in the actuated position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

The system efficiently translates the head restraint into a protective position during impacts, minimizing injury and reducing the number of components and overall mass of the vehicle seat, while maintaining the head restraint in the actuated position with minimal force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometry: Geometry

Data Source

PatentUS7455357B2Active head restraint system for a vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2008.11.25 LEAR CORP
  • US7455357B2 patent drawing
  • US7455357B2 patent drawing
  • US7455357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle seat is disclosed with a seatback frame for supporting the back of an occupant. A head restraint extends from the seatback frame for supporting the head of the occupant. In one embodiment, a four-bar mechanism is operably connected to the seatback frame and the head restraint for receiving an input force from the occupant in response to an impact condition, and for consequently actuating the head restraint to an actuated position. In another embodiment, the four-bar mechanism locks the head restraint in the actuated position in response to an input force of the occupant resting against the seatback.