Active Inductor LPF Topology for High-Bandwidth Low-Power TDD

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing low-pass filters in wireless communication systems face challenges in achieving high bandwidth while minimizing current consumption, particularly in high signal bandwidth applications, and struggle with stability issues due to the need for complex poles and feedback loops.

Innovation Solution

A filter circuitry utilizing an active inductor with a current mirror topology and switchable components, allowing for bidirectional operation and scalable bandwidth, eliminating the need for feedback loops and reducing current consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If op-amps with feedback elements are used to generate complex poles, then the required attenuation at stop band is achieved, but current consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestop band attenuationVSAvoidcurrent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the feedback loop from the filter design by using a feedforward topology. The complex poles are generated through the interaction of the feedforward path with capacitive and resistive elements, eliminating the need for op-amps with feedback while maintaining stop band attenuation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional op-amp feedback mechanism with an alternative electrical topology using feedforward amplification combined with RC networks. This substitution achieves the same filtering function without requiring high-bandwidth op-amps, thereby reducing current consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If higher bandwidth is required for 5G applications, then the signal processing capability is improved, but the unity gain bandwidth of op-amps must be increased which further increases current consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal bandwidthVSAvoidcurrent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the feedback loop dependency that constrains bandwidth to be limited by op-amp unity gain bandwidth. By using feedforward topology, the filter can operate at bandwidths determined by the RC time constants rather than op-amp limitations, enabling higher signal bandwidths without proportionally increasing current consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the design parameters from op-amp dominated specifications (unity gain bandwidth) to passive component dominated specifications (RC time constants). This allows independent optimization of bandwidth and current consumption by selecting appropriate R and C values without being constrained by op-amp performance limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real poles are used for filtering, then the filter order can be increased, but significant gain droop occurs in the passband

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering orderVSAvoidpassband gain
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses asymmetric feedforward paths with different capacitive and resistive values to create complex pole locations that provide both high-order filtering and passband gain preservation. The asymmetric RC networks generate frequency-dependent phase shifts that create complex poles without the gain droop associated with real poles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates dynamically interacting RC networks in the feedforward path that produce frequency-selective behavior. The interaction between multiple RC stages with different time constants creates complex pole pairs that provide steep roll-off while maintaining passband gain, unlike static real pole configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12028033B2Filter circuitry using active inductor
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12028033B2 patent drawing
  • US12028033B2 patent drawing
  • US12028033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter circuitry (200) using an active inductor is disclosed. The filter circuitry (200) has a first terminal (In1/Out1) and a second terminal (In2/Out2). The filter circuitry (200) comprises a first transistor (M1) and a second transistor (M2). The filter circuitry (200) further comprises a first switch (S1), a second switch (S2), a first capacitor (C1), a second capacitor (C2) and a resistor (R). The first and second transistors (M1/M2) together with the resistor (R) and the first and second switches (S1/S2) are connected in a current mirror topology. The first and second capacitors (C1/C2) are connected at the first and second terminals of the filter circuitry (200) respectively. The filter circuitry (200) is configurable to either have the first terminal (In1/Out1) as input and the second terminal (In2/Out2) as output or have the first terminal (In1/Out1) as output and the second terminal (In2/Out2) as input by changing on-off states of the first and second switches. The transistors are interconnected in a current-mirror fashion. Depending on the switch position one of the transistors also acts as part of an active inductor such that the circuit functions as a low pass filter with a complex pole pair and a real pole. Depending on the switch position the LPF allows signal flow in either direction. For use in a TDD environment in combination with a passive mixer (420).