Active Learning Crop Classification Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for crop identification in aerial data are labor-intensive, costly, and unsuitable for large-scale feature identification due to the need for extensive human labeling and the difficulty in establishing reusable decision support systems, especially when dealing with diverse agricultural regions and low-resolution aerial images.

Innovation Solution

An image-based crop identification system utilizing a database, communication module, and model library that employs active learning and interactive design to train a crop classification model using annotated aerial data, allowing for efficient updating and application across different areas with reduced manpower and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional analysis methods are used for crop identification, then human labeling can provide accurate annotations, but the process becomes labor-intensive and unsuitable for large-scale feature identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoididentification efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs active learning where the model iteratively improves itself by selecting and learning from the most informative samples. The model autonomously identifies uncertain predictions, queries annotations for those specific cases, and retrains itself, reducing dependency on extensive manual labeling while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring complete manual annotation of all aerial images, the system annotates only the most informative partial samples identified by the active learning algorithm. This selective annotation approach significantly reduces labeling effort while still achieving high model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If extensive human labeling is performed for accurate crop classification, then model training accuracy improves, but the cost and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary model training with a small initial labeled dataset before deploying active learning. This preliminary action establishes a baseline model that can then guide the selective annotation process, avoiding the need to manually label all training data from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The active learning loop continuously feeds back annotated samples to the model for retraining. The model identifies its own uncertainties, selects the most valuable samples for annotation, and iteratively improves performance with each cycle, maximizing learning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If decision support systems are established for each individual image, then local accuracy improves, but the complexity of establishing reusable systems increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system trains a universal crop classification model that can be applied across multiple aerial images and different agricultural regions. The active learning process creates a generalized model that adapts to various crops and conditions, eliminating the need to build separate decision support systems for each image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple aerial images and their corresponding annotations into a unified training dataset. By merging data from multiple sources and applying active learning across the entire dataset, the system creates a single reusable model that handles diverse agricultural scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If large amounts of annotated data are collected for model training, then model performance improves, but the manpower and cost requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidannotation quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The active learning system autonomously identifies which samples provide the most value for training. Instead of randomly or uniformly annotating data, the model self-determines the most informative samples based on its current uncertainty, maximizing learning efficiency with minimal annotations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the sampling strategy based on model performance and uncertainty metrics. Active learning adjusts which parameters (samples) are selected for annotation based on the model's current state, transitioning from uniform sampling to targeted sampling of uncertain cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11941880B2System and method for image-based crop identification
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 PING AN TECH (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US11941880B2 patent drawing
  • US11941880B2 patent drawing
  • US11941880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for image-based crop identification are disclosed. The image-based crop identification system includes a database, a communication module and a model library. The database stores sample aerial data and annotated aerial data. The communication module is coupled to the database, and is configured to provide the sample aerial data to a user and receive the annotated aerial data from the user. The model library is coupled to the database, and is configured to obtain the annotated aerial data, train a crop classification model based on the annotated aerial data, and provide the trained crop classification model for subsequent crop identification. The annotated aerial data include determination of the type of the crop appearing in the sample aerial data.