Active Learning Screening for Document Classification Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual document screening is prone to human errors, is time-consuming, inflexible, and costly, and existing computer-aided systems are not user-friendly or adaptable for large-scale document screening, especially when dealing with complex information in medical and technical documents.

Innovation Solution

An active learning screening process with dynamic information modeling, where a classification algorithm is iteratively trained using tagged documents, modifying concepts and relationships to improve document categorization accuracy over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual document screening is performed by human reviewers, then documents can be screened with understanding of complex information, but the process is time-consuming and prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening accuracyVSAvoidscreening time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical human review process with an automated computer-based system that uses natural language processing, information extraction, and machine learning algorithms to analyze documents. This substitution maintains high screening accuracy by systematically evaluating complex information while dramatically reducing the time required, as computers can process documents continuously without fatigue or breaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables documents to be screened automatically without requiring continuous human intervention. The automated screening system processes documents independently, applying predefined criteria and algorithms to evaluate relevance, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual review process while maintaining consistent accuracy across large volumes of documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a team of reviewers is used to reduce errors, then screening accuracy improves, but costs and time increase due to training and duplicate screening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening consistencyVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the human team review process with an automated system that ensures consistent application of screening criteria. The computer-based system applies the same algorithms and rules uniformly to all documents, eliminating variability between reviewers while maintaining high reliability. This automation removes the need for training multiple reviewers and conducting duplicate screenings, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the screening process from a human-dependent variable process to a standardized automated process with fixed parameters. By converting screening criteria into programmable parameters and rules, the system ensures consistent evaluation across all documents without requiring human judgment variability, thus achieving both high reliability and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional keyword-based algorithms are used for document screening, then the process is automated, but accuracy is poor for complex information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple keyword-matching algorithms with advanced natural language processing and information extraction systems. These sophisticated computer-based systems can understand complex information structures, relationships between concepts, and nuanced meanings in documents, thereby maintaining high automation capability while significantly improving classification accuracy for complex content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple advanced technologies including natural language processing, information extraction, machine learning, and concept modeling into a composite screening system. This composite approach integrates various computational methods to accurately process and evaluate complex information while maintaining full automation, overcoming the limitations of single-method keyword-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Measurement precision

If specialized information extraction products are used, then document analysis capability improves, but the systems are not user-friendly and require expert configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation extraction accuracyVSAvoidsystem usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal screening system that can handle multiple document types, domains, and screening criteria through a single integrated platform. The system is designed to be domain-agnostic and can be configured for different purposes without requiring expert knowledge, making it easily operable by users while maintaining high information extraction accuracy across diverse applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adapts to different screening needs without requiring manual configuration by experts. It self-configures by learning from provided examples and automatically adjusting its parameters and rules, thereby maintaining high extraction accuracy while being easily usable by non-experts who simply need to provide sample documents and desired outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Adaptability or versatility

If manual re-screening is performed when criteria change, then screening remains flexible, but additional fatigue and errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecriteria flexibilityVSAvoidscreening consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic screening system where criteria can be modified and the system automatically reconfigures itself. When screening criteria change, the automated system instantly adapts by updating its algorithms and rules without requiring manual re-screening of documents. This dynamic capability maintains both flexibility for criterion changes and consistency in application, eliminating human fatigue and errors associated with manual re-screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8126826B2Method and system for active learning screening process with dynamic information modeling
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 NOBLIS INC
  • US8126826B2 patent drawing
  • US8126826B2 patent drawing
  • US8126826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods consistent with the present invention improve manual screening processes for a group of documents by implementing an active learning screening process with dynamic information modeling. A classification algorithm is trained to recognize the relationships between concept tags applied to a subset of the documents and true or correct utility or relevance ratings applied to the subset of documents. Once adequately trained using several subsets of documents, the classification algorithm may be applied to the entire group of documents, screening out documents that are not relevant or important.