Active Matrix Substrate Terminal Layout for Narrower Display Frames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Display devices with higher resolution and touch panel functions face challenges in achieving narrower frames due to the increased number of terminals, leading to design restrictions and higher manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

The active matrix substrate is configured with a terminal group that includes center and end terminal groups, where end terminal groups consist of a mixture of first and second terminals, reducing the convergence of wires and securing space for terminal placement, thereby minimizing the frame size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of terminals is increased to support higher resolution and touch panel functions, then the display device can achieve higher resolution and touch functionality, but the frame size increases and design flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouch panel functionVSAvoidframe size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal group is divided into a center terminal group and end terminal groups. The end terminal groups are positioned at the ends of the substrate in the column direction, while the center terminal group is positioned in the central region. This segmentation allows wires to be routed more efficiently, reducing the overall frame size while supporting the required number of terminals for touch panel functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different terminal groups are assigned different positions and functions within the substrate. The end terminal groups handle specific wire connections at the edges, while the center terminal group manages central connections. This local differentiation optimizes wire routing and minimizes the frame size while maintaining all necessary terminal functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If terminals are arrayed at equal spacings with the same area, then the placement is simple and uniform, but the frame size cannot be minimized for high-resolution displays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal placement simplicityVSAvoidframe size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal group is segmented into center and end terminal groups with different positioning strategies. The end terminal groups are placed at the substrate ends to optimize wire routing, while the center terminal group is positioned centrally. This segmentation enables frame size minimization while maintaining manufacturability through systematic placement patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal arrangement transitions from symmetric equal-spacing to asymmetric positioning where end terminal groups are located at the ends of the substrate and the center terminal group is positioned in the central region. This asymmetric layout optimizes wire routing paths, reducing frame size while remaining practical for manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Device complexity

If the terminal group length is increased to accommodate more terminals, then the wire convergence is reduced, but the frame size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire routing complexityVSAvoidframe size
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting terminals into center and end groups, the patent distributes wire routing tasks across different spatial regions. End terminal groups handle edge wire connections while the center terminal group manages central connections, reducing overall wire convergence complexity and minimizing frame size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal arrangement utilizes the column direction positioning to optimize wire routing in the row direction. By positioning end terminal groups at the ends of the substrate in the column direction, wires can be routed more efficiently across the substrate, reducing frame size while managing routing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250231447A1Active matrix substrate and display panel
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 SHARP KK
  • US20250231447A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231447A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231447A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An active matrix substrate includes a glass substrate 26, a plurality of pixel electrodes 40 arrayed in a matrix, a plurality of TFTs 43, a plurality of common electrodes 42, a terminal group 60 provided at one end of a Y-axis direction on top of the glass substrate 26 and constituted by a plurality of terminals 61 and 62 placed along an X-axis direction, wires 71 that electrically connect the terminals 61 to the TFTs 43, and wires 72 that electrically connect the terminals 62 to the common electrodes 42. The terminal group 60 includes a center terminal group 64, constituted by a plurality of the first terminals 61, that constitutes a center portion of the terminal group 60 in the X-axis direction, and end terminal groups 65L and 65R, each constituted by a plurality of the first terminals and a plurality of the second terminals, that constitute both side portions, respectively, of the terminal group 60 in the X-axis direction and in each of which the second terminals 62 are each disposed between two of the first terminals 61 adjacent to each other.