Active Noise Control Apparatus with Adaptive Amplitude Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing active noise control apparatuses face challenges in effectively canceling road noise due to unpredictable amplitude changes, leading to clipping of canceling signals and reduced noise reduction capability, especially when the sum of amplitudes exceeds the mixer's output range.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an amplitude suppressor that adjusts the amplitude of one canceling signal based on another, using adaptive notch filters and a noise reduction priority sequence to optimize the output range of the mixer, preventing clipping by suppressing lower-priority noise signals when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the output range of the mixer is divided into equal subranges for multiple canceling signals, then the system can handle multiple noise types, but the canceling signal with large amplitude becomes clipped when the sum exceeds the mixer output range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle multiple noise typesVSAvoidnoise canceling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the subrange assignment adaptive rather than fixed. The amplitude suppressor dynamically adjusts which noise type receives the full output range based on real-time amplitude comparisons. When road noise amplitude exceeds engine noise amplitude, the system switches subrange assignments to prioritize road noise cancellation, ensuring optimal performance for the dominant noise source while maintaining versatility for handling multiple noise types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If equal subranges are assigned to each canceling signal, then the system structure is simple, but the road noise cancelation performance deteriorates when road noise magnitude changes greatly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixer subrange assignment structureVSAvoidroad noise cancelation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static equal subrange assignment to a dynamic adaptive assignment. The amplitude suppressor continuously monitors the amplitudes of different noise types and dynamically reallocates the mixer's output range. When road noise becomes the dominant noise source, the system automatically assigns the full output range to the road noise canceling signal, ensuring reliable cancelation performance despite varying road conditions without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the mixer output range is fully utilized for one noise type, then that noise type achieves optimal cancelation, but other noise types suffer from reduced output range and potential clipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancelation performance for dominant noise typeVSAvoidsimultaneous handling of multiple noise types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic priority-based resource allocation. The amplitude suppressor compares amplitudes of different noise types in real-time and dynamically assigns the full mixer output range to the dominant noise type. This dynamic switching mechanism ensures that whichever noise type is most prominent at any given moment receives optimal cancelation resources, while maintaining the system's ability to handle multiple noise types by switching priorities as conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8848937B2Active noise control apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US8848937B2 patent drawing
  • US8848937B2 patent drawing
  • US8848937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active noise control apparatus includes a first active noise controller for generating a first canceling signal for a first noise type, a second active noise controller for generating a second canceling signal for a second noise type that is different from the first noise type, a mixer for mixing the first canceling signal and the second canceling signal into a mixed canceling signal, a canceling sound output unit for outputting a canceling sound based on the mixed canceling signal, and an amplitude suppressor for suppressing the amplitude of the second canceling signal depending on the amplitude of the first canceling signal.