Active Reflection Cancellation for Auditorium Reverberation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large public venues like auditoriums suffer from excessive reverberation, which degrades sound quality due to echoes and reflections, and existing solutions are either impractical or ineffective in creating a consistent 'quiet zone' across the space.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that attenuate sound at or near reflective surfaces by generating a phase-opposite audio wavefront to cancel reflections, using an array of microphones and loudspeakers to reduce reverberations before they reach the audience, with adaptive algorithms to minimize error signals and ensure broad coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If loudspeakers are elevated and pointed away from the ceiling to reduce reflections, then reverberation is reduced, but the sound source becomes perceptively disjointed from the performer

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereverberationVSAvoidaudience perception
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the acoustic treatment into multiple zones: the primary sound source remains on stage for performer-audience connection, while separate cancelling loudspeakers are positioned near reflective surfaces to locally cancel reflections. This allows the main sound source to maintain its optimal positioning without causing perceptively disjointed sound, while reflections are cancelled in specific problem areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (cancelling loudspeakers and control module) between the sound source and the reflective surfaces. Instead of moving the primary sound source, the system uses intermediary devices to cancel reflections at their origin points, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining sound source positioning and reducing reverberation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If loudspeakers are placed throughout the auditorium pointed at the audience to maintain sound source perception, then audience perception is improved, but reverberation and delayed reflections increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudience perceptionVSAvoidreverberation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of reflections into a beneficial outcome by using the same reflective surfaces that cause problems as mounting locations for cancelling loudspeakers. The reflections are cancelled at their origin points near the reflective surfaces, preventing them from propagating into the audience area while maintaining the perceived sound source location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If active sound cancellation is used to create a quiet zone by attenuating reflected sounds, then reverberation is reduced, but the system requires complex tuning and expert installation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereverberationVSAvoidsystem tuning
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates adaptive control algorithms that automatically adjust the cancellation parameters based on real-time acoustic measurements. The control module continuously monitors the acoustic environment and self-adjusts the cancelling signals, eliminating the need for manual expert tuning and making the system easier to install and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where microphones monitor the actual acoustic field and the control module adjusts the cancelling loudspeaker outputs based on this feedback. This closed-loop control system automatically optimizes the cancellation performance, reducing the need for manual tuning and expert intervention during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces reverberations at their source, improving audio intelligibility and reducing noise transmission into surrounding environments, while being adaptable to various venue sizes and shapes.

Implementation Method 1

generating a phase-opposite cancelling audio wavefront to attenuate sound reflections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS8553898B2Method and system for reducing acoustical reverberations in an at least partially enclosed space
Publication Date: 2013.10.08 RAFTERY EMMET
  • US8553898B2 patent drawing
  • US8553898B2 patent drawing
  • US8553898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of increasing the intelligibility of an audio broadcast in an at least partially enclosed space from at least one amplified audio source. An input microphone receives an incident audio wavefront at a first position in the at least partially enclosed space. An active noise control system is employed to generate a cancelling audio wavefront having a magnitude substantially equal to the magnitude of incident audio wavefront and a phase substantially opposite to the phase of the incident audio wavefront. The cancelling audio wavefront is broadcast at a second position in the at least partially enclosed space adjacent to a reflective surface of the at least partially enclosed space so as to attenuate the incident audio wavefront substantially at or near the reflective surface in order to reduce reverberations of the incident audio wavefront. In this manner, reverberations which could reduce the intelligibility of the audio broadcast to an audience is reduced.