Active Multi-Pole RF Filter with Independent Pole Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tunable RF filters face complexity in controlling individual resonators, especially when multiple resonators are used, leading to issues with center frequency, bandwidth, resonator stability, and noise creation, with external factors like temperature and component aging also posing challenges.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an active multi-pole placement (AMPP) method, which involves a signal loop with a resonator and a processing block that allows for independent control of the poles of the transfer function, enabling parallel processing and domain transformation to achieve precise control over resonator outputs, thereby enhancing bandwidth and frequency tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple resonators are used in tunable RF filters, then frequency selectivity and bandwidth control are improved, but device complexity and control difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency selectivityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple resonator control functions into a single integrated feedback processing block. This block receives outputs from multiple resonators, processes them collectively through domain transformation, and generates unified feedback signals that simultaneously control all resonator poles. This merging approach maintains the frequency selectivity benefits of multiple resonators while eliminating the exponential growth in control complexity that would otherwise result from individually controlling each resonator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback processing block serves multiple functions simultaneously: it collects outputs from multiple resonators, performs domain transformation, synthesizes feedback signals for pole control, and adjusts for external factors like temperature and component aging. This multi-functional universal block replaces what would otherwise require multiple separate control circuits, thereby improving frequency selectivity through coordinated multi-resonator operation while keeping the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional tunable filter control methods are used, then center frequency and bandwidth can be adjusted, but resonator stability deteriorates and noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidresonator stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where outputs from multiple resonators are fed back through a processing block that performs domain transformation and synthesizes corrective signals. These feedback signals are applied to the resonators to actively maintain pole positions and compensate for drift caused by temperature variations and component aging. This feedback approach enables wide tuning range and bandwidth adjustment while simultaneously improving resonator stability and reducing noise, directly addressing the contradiction between adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback processing block performs preliminary compensation for expected drift and noise issues before they significantly degrade performance. By continuously monitoring resonator outputs and pre-adjusting feedback signals to counteract temperature effects and component aging, the system maintains stability across the full tuning range. This preliminary action prevents the deterioration of resonator stability that would otherwise occur during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If individual resonator parameters are adjusted for compensation, then frequency accuracy is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges all frequency compensation adjustments into a single feedback processing block that operates in the transformed domain. Instead of requiring precise individual adjustment of each resonator's fixed value components during manufacturing, the system combines all compensation functions into one integrated block that processes multiple resonator outputs and generates coordinated feedback signals. This merging approach achieves high frequency accuracy while dramatically simplifying manufacturing, as the compensation is handled automatically by the feedback system rather than requiring complex manual calibration of multiple individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11955942B2Active multi-pole filter
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 ANLOTEK LTD
  • US11955942B2 patent drawing
  • US11955942B2 patent drawing
  • US11955942B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An RF signal is processed by coupling an input signal into a signal loop, the signal loop comprising a resonator and a processing block, and filtering the input signal in the signal loop to produce an output signal by obtaining a plurality of resonator outputs from the resonator and processing the plurality of resonator outputs to generate feedback signals. The feedback signals are connected to a point upstream of the resonator. At least one of the plurality of resonator outputs is processed in the processing block. The signal loop is definable by a transfer function having poles, and the plurality of resonator outputs are processed such that the poles of the transfer function are independently controllable.