Active Rotor Damping via Electro-Mechanical Actuators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current passive lead-lag dampers in rotor systems are limited in their ability to provide optimal damping across varying rotor blade dynamics, leading to instability and increased maintenance costs due to hydraulic systems, which are inefficient and require frequent maintenance.

Innovation Solution

An active lead-lag damping system using electro-mechanical actuators with rotary inductive devices and a controller that applies variable damping, allowing for optimized closed-loop control and energy regeneration, eliminating the need for hydraulic systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If passive lead-lag dampers using hydraulic restriction are used, then rotor system stability is improved, but device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor system stabilityVSAvoidhydraulic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic damping mechanism with an electro-mechanical actuator that uses electrical signals to control lead-lag damping. The actuator includes a motor, gear train, and piston assembly that converts electrical commands into mechanical damping forces, eliminating hydraulic fluid, seals, and high-pressure systems while achieving the same stability function through electrical control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If passive lead-lag dampers are used, then rotor system stability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to frequent maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor system stabilityVSAvoidmaintenance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The electro-mechanical actuator eliminates hydraulic components that require maintenance such as seal replacements, fluid changes, and pressure system inspections. The electrical system with motor, gear train, and piston assembly has fewer wear points and can be monitored and adjusted through electrical signals, significantly reducing maintenance frequency and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator incorporates sensors and control electronics that enable self-diagnosis and adaptive adjustment of damping characteristics. The system can monitor its own operation, detect anomalies, and adjust damping forces in real-time without requiring external intervention or maintenance personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Force

If passive dampers operate under high pressure, then damping force is sufficient, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping forceVSAvoidenergy dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The electro-mechanical actuator dynamically adjusts damping forces based on real-time rotor conditions, blade position, and flight regime. Unlike passive dampers that continuously resist motion, the active system applies damping forces only when needed and at optimal magnitudes, reducing energy dissipation while maintaining sufficient damping force for stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes damping parameters (force magnitude, stiffness, damping coefficient) in real-time based on operational conditions. The controller adjusts electrical signals to the motor to vary the damping characteristics of the piston assembly, optimizing the balance between providing sufficient damping force and minimizing energy loss across different flight conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances rotor stability by providing the minimum necessary damping, reducing load and vibration inputs, and significantly decreasing maintenance costs by eliminating hydraulic components and enabling self-sufficiency within the rotor system.

Implementation Method 1

a rotary inductive device and a gear train respectively associated with each EMA and the corresponding rotary inductive device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a rotary inductive device and a gear train respectively associated with each EMA and the corresponding rotary inductive device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10577095B2Active rotor damping system
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US10577095B2 patent drawing
  • US10577095B2 patent drawing
  • US10577095B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft is provided and includes a non-rotating frame, an engine disposed in the non-rotating frame, a rotating frame, which is drivable by the engine to rotate relative to the non-rotating frame to generate lift and thrust, the rotating frame including a hub and rotor blades extending outwardly from the hub, an actuation system including electro-mechanical actuators (EMAs) respectively disposed in the rotating frame between the hub and the rotor blades, each EMA including a rotary inductive device, a gear train associated with each EMA and the corresponding rotary inductive device to convert linear displacements of a piston responsive to rotor blade lead/lag into rotation of the rotary inductive device and a controller that controls the rotary inductive device to operate, in a first mode, as a motor which drives the gear train, and, in a second mode, as a generator which is driven by the gear train.