Active Seal Architecture for Variable Closure Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional passive seals used in applications like vehicle doors face a tradeoff between seal effectiveness and closure effort, as increasing interface pressure or contact area enhances sealing but increases door opening and closing efforts, and they cannot be remotely controlled to alter stiffness or geometry.

Innovation Solution

Active material seal architectures that include a flexible outer layer and an interior structure with active material elements, allowing for variable sealing force and stiffness by changing the material's properties or geometry in response to external stimuli, such as electric current or temperature changes, to optimize sealing performance with minimal power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive seal assemblies are used to provide sealing engagement, then seal effectiveness is improved through increased interface pressure and contact area, but closure effort increases making door opening and closing more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal effectivenessVSAvoidclosure effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The seal assembly transitions from a static passive structure to a dynamic active system that can change its sealing properties on demand. The active material elements (such as piezoelectric, electrostrictive, or dielectric elastomer materials) allow the seal to dynamically adjust its cross-sectional geometry and stiffness in response to electrical stimuli, enabling variable sealing force without permanently increasing closure effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the seal assembly by using active materials whose elastic modulus, shape, and volume can be modified through electrical fields. This allows the seal to transition between different states (e.g., compressed vs. relaxed cross-sectional geometry) to optimize the balance between sealing effectiveness and closure effort under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If passive seal materials are used, then the seal structure is simple and cost-effective, but the stiffness and cross-sectional geometry cannot be remotely changed or controlled on demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal structure simplicityVSAvoidremote controllability of stiffness and geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces traditional mechanical adjustment mechanisms (such as adjustable bolts, levers, or mechanical actuators) with electrical field-based active materials. This substitution allows remote and precise control of the seal's stiffness and geometry through electrical signals, greatly enhancing adaptability while maintaining relatively simple seal architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The seal assembly incorporates composite structures combining passive elastomeric materials with active material elements (such as piezoelectric ceramics, electrostrictive polymers, or dielectric elastomers). This composite approach integrates the beneficial properties of both material types: the passive materials provide structural support and sealing functionality, while the active materials enable remote control of stiffness and geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If increased interface pressure is applied by passive seals, then sealing performance is enhanced, but the force required to open and close doors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoiddoor opening and closing force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The active seal assembly can apply sealing force periodically or intermittently rather than continuously. The control system activates the active material elements only when sealing is required (e.g., when the door reaches the closed position), allowing high sealing force to be generated on demand without requiring continuously high closure effort throughout the door operation cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The active materials can be pre-conditioned or pre-positioned to generate sealing force at the critical moment when the door closes. The control system anticipates the closing action and activates the active elements in advance or at the precise moment needed, ensuring optimal sealing force is applied when the door contacts the seal, thereby reducing the overall force needed for door operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These active seals reduce the force required to open and close doors while maintaining sealing pressure, minimizing air bind and potentially eliminating the need for secondary seals, offering lower costs, reduced noise, and increased packaging flexibility compared to conventional actuators.

Implementation Method 1

an interior structure comprising at least one active material element... configured to impart a first force upon the layer or produce a first stiffness when the element is deactivated, and a second force upon the layer or second stiffness when activated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroactive material actuation: Electroactive Polymer

Data Source

PatentUS8789314B2Active seal architectures
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8789314B2 patent drawing
  • US8789314B2 patent drawing
  • US8789314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Active seal architectures adapted for producing a variable sealing and/or closing force between a closure panel and perimeter, includes a mounting clip, a flexible outer layer fixedly connected to the clip, defining an interior space, and longitudinally extending along the perimeter; and an interior structure comprising and reconfigurable by an active material disposed within the space, and operable to impart differing first and second forces upon the layer and panel when the material is activated and deactivated respectively.