Active Sound Compensation for Theater Acoustic Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soundproofing techniques in theaters are bulky, restrictive, and often ineffective in eliminating loud sounds, limiting creative design and consumer experience.

Innovation Solution

An active acoustic compensation system that identifies impending acoustic events in one theater and generates counter-events in another to mask or cancel them through processor-controlled content presentation systems, using data on sound attributes and transmission losses to synchronize and attenuate the noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional soundproofing techniques (room-within-a-room, sound baffles, specialized materials) are used, then sound isolation is improved, but device complexity and space requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound isolationVSAvoidsoundproofing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces passive mechanical soundproofing structures (walls, baffles, insulation materials) with an active electronic system that uses microphones to detect sound leaks and speakers to generate anti-phase sound waves that cancel the harmful sounds through destructive interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system that processes sound detected by microphones and generates compensating sound waves through speakers, acting as a mediator between the sound source and the theater interior to eliminate noise without requiring physical soundproofing structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional soundproofing techniques are used, then sound isolation is improved, but the theater design flexibility and creative ability are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound isolationVSAvoidtheater design flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rigid mechanical soundproofing structures with a flexible electronic system that can be integrated into existing theater designs without requiring specific architectural configurations, allowing theater designers to maintain creative freedom while achieving sound isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional soundproofing techniques are used, then some sound dampening is achieved, but effectiveness against loud sounds is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound dampeningVSAvoidsoundproofing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by detecting sound waves that leak into the theater and generating anti-phase sound waves in advance to cancel the harmful sounds before they significantly impact the audio experience, ensuring reliable sound isolation even for loud external sounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where microphones continuously monitor sound levels inside the theater, and the control system adjusts the anti-phase sound waves in real-time to maintain effective sound cancellation against varying external noise levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively mitigates detectable sounds from one theater in another by generating synchronized acoustic or visual counter-events, enhancing the consumer experience through improved sound management without the need for bulky infrastructure.

Implementation Method 1

the second acoustic event mitigates the first acoustic event via destructive cancellation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS10332503B1System and method for active sound compensation
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • US10332503B1 patent drawing
  • US10332503B1 patent drawing
  • US10332503B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for active acoustic compensation in proximate theaters are disclosed herein. Such a system can include a first theater including a first content presentation system and a second theater including a second content presentation system. The system can include a processor in communicating connection with the first content presentation system and the second content presentation system. The processor can be controlled to: direct presentation of first content in the first theater via the first content presentation system; direct presentation of second content in the second theater via the second content presentation system; identify an impending first acoustic event in the first theater; and control the second content presentation system to generate a second acoustic event to mitigate the detectability of the first acoustic event in the second theater.