Active State Excitation for Battery Control Under Uncertain Internal States

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated control systems for batteries and other physical systems face challenges in determining responses to varying conditions and managing uncertainty, particularly when internal states are not directly observable, leading to inefficiencies in operation and optimization.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a model realization system that performs non-destructive active excitation of battery and other physical systems to generate incremental parametric non-linear state models, allowing for real-time control and optimization of operations by analyzing responses to injected pulses and using intelligent sensors to collect data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated control systems use traditional modeling approaches for batteries and physical systems, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to uncertainty in internal states and unobservable conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal state measurement precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary modeling layer that acts as a mediator between the physical system and control system. This layer uses incremental parametric non-linear state models to represent internal battery states (temperature, chemistry) that are not directly observable, allowing the control system to make decisions based on modeled state estimates rather than direct measurements, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring direct access to all internal parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the control approach by changing from static models to incremental parametric non-linear state models. These models dynamically adjust parameters based on operating conditions (charge/discharge rates, temperature), allowing the system to adapt to varying internal states and improve measurement precision across different operational regimes without increasing fundamental system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If automated control systems implement comprehensive monitoring of internal states, then reliability improves, but loss of energy increases due to continuous measurement and control activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery operation reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumed by control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial monitoring by focusing measurement and modeling efforts on the most critical internal states that significantly impact reliability (such as temperature and charge state). Rather than continuously monitoring all possible parameters, the system selectively models key states using the incremental parametric approach, achieving improved reliability while minimizing the energy overhead associated with comprehensive monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary modeling and state estimation before control actions are executed. By using the incremental parametric non-linear state models to predict internal states and potential issues in advance, the control system can make proactive decisions that improve reliability without requiring continuous high-energy monitoring during critical operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If static models and constraints are used to control physical systems, then device complexity is minimized, but adaptability deteriorates when operating conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptability to varying conditionsVSAvoidmodeling and control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static models with dynamic incremental parametric non-linear state models that automatically adapt to changing operating conditions. These models capture the time-varying nature of battery and physical system behavior, adjusting their parameters based on current state and operating conditions, thereby providing the necessary adaptability while maintaining a structured approach that limits complexity growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11644806B1Using active non-destructive state excitation of a physical system to model and control operations of the physical system
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 GRIDBEYOND LTD
  • US11644806B1 patent drawing
  • US11644806B1 patent drawing
  • US11644806B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for implementing automated control systems to control operations of target physical systems and/or their components (e.g., a fuel cell, wind turbine, HVAC unit, etc.), such as based at least in part on models of their dynamic non-linear behaviors that are generated by gathering and analyzing information about their operations under varying conditions. The techniques may include, for each of multiple levels of inputs to the system/component and/or other factors, injecting a corresponding signal input into the system/component, and using active sensors to collect time changes of the responses to these pulses. Information about the inputs and the responses is used to generate an incremental parametric model representing the internal state and behavioral dynamics of the system/component, which is further used to control additional ongoing operations of the system/component (e.g., to control whether and how much output is produced in a current or future time period).