Active Vehicle Suspension for Constant Force on Uneven Terrain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vehicle suspension systems are limited in their ability to provide constant force capability and independent corner control, especially on uneven terrain, which restricts off-road performance and accessibility.

Innovation Solution

A fully-active, multiple degree of freedom suspension system with a combination of telescoping drive shafts and active control elements, including linear and rotational actuators, to facilitate near-constant force transfer and increased wheel travel, enabling superior off-road performance and terrain accessibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional suspension systems are used, then the structure is simple, but the ability to provide constant force capability and independent corner control is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstant force capabilityVSAvoidsuspension system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system is divided into multiple independent control zones with separate actuators for each wheel assembly, allowing independent corner control and constant force capability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs active actuators that dynamically adjust suspension parameters in real-time to maintain constant force capability across varying terrain conditions, transforming a static system into an adaptive one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional suspension systems are used, then the system is easy to manufacture, but off-road performance and terrain accessibility are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain accessibilityVSAvoidsuspension system production
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system performs multiple functions including force control, independent corner control, and terrain adaptation within a single integrated design, maximizing terrain accessibility while consolidating manufacturing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs nested telescoping drive shafts where one shaft is positioned within another, allowing compact packaging of multiple power transmission functions while maintaining ease of assembly and manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Force

If telescoping drive shafts and active control elements are added, then near-constant force transfer is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transferVSAvoidpower transmission system
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Telescoping drive shafts are nested within each other, with the second shaft positioned inside the first shaft, allowing multiple power transmission functions in a compact configuration that manages complexity through spatial efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple power transmission functions are merged into a single integrated housing structure, consolidating the telescoping shafts and active control elements into one unified assembly that reduces overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12005777B2Systems and methods for vehicle suspensions
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 OSHKOSH CORPORATION
  • US12005777B2 patent drawing
  • US12005777B2 patent drawing
  • US12005777B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A suspension element includes a housing, a first joint, and a second joint. The housing is configured to couple a tractive element assembly to a vehicle. The housing has a first end configured to engage a portion of the vehicle and a second end configured to interface with the tractive element assembly. The first joint includes a first actuator and a first resilient member. The first actuator is configured to facilitate linear extension and retraction of the suspension element. The second joint includes a second actuator and a second resilient member. The second actuator is configured to facilitate rotational movement of the suspension element. The first resilient member and the second resilient member are configured to support a static load of the vehicle.