Active Suspension Damping Control for Impact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active vehicle suspension systems face a challenge in maintaining optimal ride comfort by balancing damping levels, as low damping allows significant impact forces when encountering road depressions, while high damping worsens ride quality on smooth surfaces.

Innovation Solution

An active vehicle suspension system with a controller that adjusts damping levels based on wheel vertical velocity thresholds, incrementally increasing damping only when the wheel encounters a depression to minimize impact forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If damping levels are kept low to maximize ride comfort on smooth surfaces, then ride quality is improved, but impact forces increase when encountering road depressions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveride qualityVSAvoidimpact forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The damping level is made dynamically adjustable based on real-time wheel velocity conditions. The system transitions from a static low damping setting to a dynamic control mode where damping increases automatically when wheel velocity exceeds a threshold, indicating a pothole encounter. This resolves the contradiction by allowing low damping for comfort during normal operation while enabling high damping for impact reduction when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The damping parameter is changed from a fixed low value to a variable value that responds to wheel velocity conditions. When the wheel velocity exceeds the threshold velocity, the damping level is increased to reduce impact forces. This parameter change strategy allows the system to optimize both ride comfort and impact force reduction under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If damping levels are increased to reduce impact forces from potholes, then impact forces are reduced, but ride quality deteriorates on smooth surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact forcesVSAvoidride quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic control to adjust damping levels based on actual road conditions detected through wheel velocity monitoring. Instead of maintaining constantly high damping, the system activates high damping only when wheel velocity exceeds the threshold, indicating a pothole. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by applying high damping selectively rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The damping control operates in periodic cycles of monitoring wheel velocity and adjusting damping levels accordingly. The controller continuously monitors wheel velocity and periodically adjusts damping based on whether the threshold is exceeded. This periodic action allows the system to maintain low damping for comfort during normal operation while providing high damping when potholes are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If a timer is used to delay damping adjustment after detecting threshold velocity, then false positives are reduced, but response time to actual potholes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The timer mechanism performs a preliminary verification action before committing to damping adjustment. When wheel velocity first exceeds the threshold, the timer is activated to monitor whether the condition persists. This preliminary action filters out transient false positives while still enabling rapid response to genuine potholes, as the timer duration is set to be sufficiently short to not significantly delay necessary damping adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces impact forces during pothole encounters while maintaining low damping for smooth surfaces, enhancing ride quality by dynamically controlling damping forces.

Implementation Method 1

an active damping mechanism operatively coupled to a vehicle wheel and configured for controlling a damping force applied to the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9321320B2Ride performance optimization in an active suspension system
Publication Date: 2016.04.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9321320B2 patent drawing
  • US9321320B2 patent drawing
  • US9321320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active vehicle suspension system includes an active damping mechanism operatively coupled to a vehicle wheel and configured for controlling a damping force applied to the wheel responsive to a control signal. A controller is operatively coupled to the damping mechanism and configured for generating a control signal to the damping mechanism responsive to velocity of the wheel in a downward vertical direction.