Active Suspension Actuator Decoupling Lateral Wheel Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active vehicle suspension systems face challenges in effectively decoupling lateral motions such as fore-aft and side-side movements from the wheel, leading to increased bending loads and reduced efficiency in force transmission, particularly when integrated with steering linkages.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a linear electromagnetic actuator with a stator rigidly attached to the vehicle frame and an armature movable relative to the stator, coupled with a control rod that mechanically decouples the active suspension element from lateral wheel motions, and optionally combined with a passive suspension element, to manage bending loads and enhance packaging efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the active suspension element is rigidly coupled to the wheel assembly through suspension linkage, then the force transmission is direct, but lateral motions (fore-aft and side-side) are not effectively decoupled, causing increased bending loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transmission efficiencyVSAvoidbending loads on actuator
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the active suspension element from direct coupling with the wheel assembly by introducing a control rod as an intermediary. The actuator is rigidly mounted to the chassis while the control rod connects the armature to the wheel, creating distinct functional segments that allow force transmission while decoupling lateral motions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control rod serves as a mechanical intermediary between the active suspension element and the wheel assembly. It transmits vertical forces from the actuator to the wheel while allowing lateral motions to occur without directly loading the actuator, thereby reducing bending loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the active suspension element is mechanically coupled to suspension linkage and steering linkage, then integration is achieved, but lateral motions are transmitted to the actuator, increasing complexity and reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration with suspension and steeringVSAvoidmechanical coupling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the active suspension element from the traditional suspension linkage and steering linkage couplings. By mounting the actuator rigidly to the chassis and using a separate control rod, it removes the problematic mechanical couplings while maintaining the necessary functional integrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of coupling the actuator to the moving wheel assembly through linkages, the invention inverts the approach by rigidly mounting the actuator to the stationary chassis and using a control rod to connect to the wheel. This reversal eliminates lateral motion transmission while maintaining control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of manufacture

If the actuator envelope is allowed to change with wheel motion, then packaging flexibility is improved, but system complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging flexibilityVSAvoidactuator space requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is pre-positioned in a fixed location on the chassis with a predetermined envelope. The control rod is designed with appropriate length and attachment points to accommodate wheel motion while the actuator itself remains stationary, eliminating the need for the actuator envelope to change with wheel motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces the flexing mass during lateral excitations, improves force transmission efficiency, and simplifies packaging by maintaining a fixed envelope actuator design, thereby enhancing the overall performance and stability of the active suspension system.

Implementation Method 1

a linear electromagnetic actuator having a stator and an armature that is movable relative to the stator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7823891B2Active vehicle suspension system
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 CLEARMOTION ACQUISITION I LLC
  • US7823891B2 patent drawing
  • US7823891B2 patent drawing
  • US7823891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active suspension system for a vehicle includes an active suspension element that is substantially rigidly attached to a frame of the vehicle such that a motion of an armature of the active suspension element is mechanically decoupled from a lateral motion of a wheel of the vehicle. A control rod is attached between the active suspension element and the wheel of the vehicle.