Active Suspension Modal Modeling for Smoother Vehicle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional active suspension systems rely on simplified models that are not based on actual vehicle parameters, leading to inaccurate predictions and overreactive responses, which can compromise ride comfort and increase component wear.

Innovation Solution

The use of a modal expansion model that represents the vehicle as a linear combination of natural modes, allowing for the determination of actual vehicle parameters such as mass, damping, and stiffness matrices from sensor data, enabling more accurate predictions and smoother actuator responses over a longer period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simplified models are used for active suspension control, then device complexity is reduced, but prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the simplified model into a data-driven model by changing the parameters from theoretical assumptions to actual measured vehicle parameters (mass, damping, stiffness) obtained from sensor data and system identification, thereby improving prediction accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensor data from the vehicle to continuously update and refine the mathematical model through system identification, allowing the model to adapt to actual vehicle behavior and improve prediction accuracy over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If simplified models are used for active suspension control, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from sensor data to continuously refine the model parameters through system identification, ensuring the model reflects actual vehicle behavior and improves reliability while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically updating its own model parameters using its own sensor data and system identification algorithms, improving reliability without requiring external intervention or complex manual calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If conventional models predict over short time windows, then response speed is improved, but prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the model parameters from fixed theoretical values to adaptive parameters derived from sensor data and system identification, enabling accurate predictions over extended time windows while maintaining fast response through efficient computational algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If overreactive responses are generated, then responsiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse responsivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameters from overreactive responses based on simplified models to optimized responses based on accurate data-driven predictions, reducing unnecessary actuator movements and energy consumption while maintaining appropriate responsiveness to actual vehicle dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11938776B1Multiple model active suspension control
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 ZOOX INC
  • US11938776B1 patent drawing
  • US11938776B1 patent drawing
  • US11938776B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An active suspension control system for a vehicle includes a mathematical model based on a modal expansion of the vehicle. Model parameters of the vehicle can be extracted from the modal expansion using sensor data generated on the vehicle, e.g., on demand and/or in real time. The model parameters and the modal expansion can be used to determine a vehicle state, predict future vehicle states, and control aspects of an active suspension system based on the predicted future vehicle states. The model parameters may also be used to update the mathematical model, e.g., to account for component wear over time, and/or to detect anomalies or defects in the active suspension system.