Active Suspension Model Updating for Smoother Vehicle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional active suspension systems rely on simplified models that are not based on actual vehicle parameters, leading to inaccurate predictions and overreactive responses, which affect ride comfort and component wear.

Innovation Solution

The use of a modal expansion model that represents the vehicle as a linear combination of natural modes, allowing for the determination of actual vehicle parameters such as mass, damping, and stiffness matrices from sensor data, enabling more accurate predictions and smoother actuator responses over a longer period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simplified models are used for active suspension control, then device complexity is reduced, but prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the suspension control problem from using simplified constant parameters to using time-varying parameters that adapt to changing road conditions. The modal parameters (mass, damping, stiffness) are continuously updated based on measured vibration data, allowing the system to maintain accuracy without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's own vibration responses to automatically identify and update its parameters. By measuring the natural frequencies and mode shapes from actual vehicle operation, the system self-calibrates without requiring external input or manual adjustment, maintaining accuracy while avoiding complex external sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If simplified models are used for active suspension control, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual vehicle response is continuously measured and used to update the modal parameters. This closed-loop approach ensures that the control system adapts to changing conditions, maintaining reliability while keeping the control algorithm structure simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional suspension systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but energy consumption increases due to overreactive responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension system complexityVSAvoidactuator energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static, fixed-parameter suspension control to dynamic, adaptive control where the modal parameters continuously evolve with vehicle operation. This allows the system to respond appropriately to actual conditions rather than overreacting to transient disturbances, reducing unnecessary actuator activity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11993122B1Updating vehicle models for improved suspension control
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 ZOOX INC
  • US11993122B1 patent drawing
  • US11993122B1 patent drawing
  • US11993122B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An active suspension control system for a vehicle includes a mathematical model based on a modal expansion of the vehicle. Model parameters of the vehicle can be extracted from the modal expansion using sensor data generated on the vehicle, e.g., on demand and/or in real time. The model parameters and the modal expansion can be used to determine a vehicle state, predict future vehicle states, and control aspects of an active suspension system based on the predicted future vehicle states. The model parameters may also be used to update the mathematical model, e.g., to account for component wear over time, and/or to detect anomalies or defects in the active suspension system.