Active Suspension Normal Force Control for Split-Traction Wheels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems struggle to maximize traction on surfaces with varying coefficients of friction, as limited slip differentials and traction control systems are inadequate in dynamically adjusting wheel-to-surface normal forces to optimize traction distribution.

Innovation Solution

An active suspension system controlled by a control system that adjusts wheel normal forces based on relative traction levels, increasing normal force on wheels with high traction and decreasing it on wheels with low traction, using actuators to dynamically change the wheel-to-body distance and manage vehicle weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If limited slip differentials or locking differentials are used to prevent differential slip between wheels, then traction is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the normal force on each wheel dynamically adjustable through active suspension actuators. The system continuously monitors wheel slip and traction conditions, then actively modifies the normal force distribution in real-time to optimize traction at each wheel independently, replacing static mechanical differentials with dynamic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of normal force applied to each wheel based on detected traction conditions. By varying the normal force parameter dynamically through active suspension, the system optimizes the friction force (F = μN) at each wheel contact patch, allowing adaptation to varying surface conditions without complex mechanical differential mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If braking is applied to slipping wheels to reduce speed and transfer torque, then traction is improved, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoidloss of energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively adjusting the normal force on wheels before significant slip occurs. By detecting early signs of traction loss and preemptively modifying normal force distribution, the system prevents wheel spin and reduces the need for energy-intensive braking interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potentially harmful effect of weight transfer during braking into a benefit by using active suspension to deliberately and controllably transfer weight to wheels with better traction. This controlled weight transfer increases normal force and friction at high-traction wheels, improving overall vehicle propulsion efficiency without the energy loss associated with brake-based traction control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If active suspension system dynamically adjusts normal force distribution, then traction is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by making the active suspension system perform multiple functions: it provides both ride comfort (traditional suspension function) and traction optimization (new function). By integrating traction control into the existing active suspension infrastructure, the system avoids adding separate dedicated traction control mechanisms, thereby managing complexity while achieving improved traction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies self-service by using the active suspension's own actuators and control capabilities to perform traction optimization. The suspension system serves itself by leveraging its existing ability to adjust wheel positions and forces, eliminating the need for separate traction control hardware and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances traction by optimizing weight distribution, allowing vehicles to maintain or regain traction on uneven surfaces, improving vehicle stability and propulsion efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

using actuators to dynamically change the wheel-to-body distance and manage vehicle weight distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActive suspension actuation: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

Enhances traction by optimizing weight distribution, allowing vehicles to maintain or regain traction on uneven surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12459325B2Traction-dependent variation of wheel-to-surface normal force
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • US12459325B2 patent drawing
  • US12459325B2 patent drawing
  • US12459325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system (300) for controlling an active suspension system (104) of a vehicle (100), the control system comprising one or more controller (301), wherein the control system is configured to: obtain (908) information indicative of relative traction levels between different wheels (FL, FR, RL, RR) of the vehicle; and in dependence on the information, control (912) the active suspension system to increase normal force through a wheel (FR) of the vehicle having relatively high traction compared to one or more other wheels (FL, RL, RR) of the vehicle, and decrease normal force through a wheel (FL) of the vehicle having relatively low traction compared to one or more other wheels (FR, RL, RR) of the vehicle.