Active Tension Bone Stabilization Spring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bone and joint stabilization devices in orthopedic surgery lack continuous compression and often require removal, as they can cause adverse reactions and loosen over time due to migration or loosening of features.

Innovation Solution

A tensioned orthopedic surgery system using an elongate spring member with anchoring heads and a distal foot, allowing for minimal incision removal and featuring a superelastic NiTi alloy and a sheath to prevent tissue ingrowth, providing continuous compression without twisting motions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid stabilization devices (screws, staples, plates) are used for bone fusion and joint stabilization, then structural strength and stability are improved, but the risk of adverse reactions and loosening over time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidlong-term stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic spring member that maintains continuous active tension on the bone or joint, allowing the device to adapt and maintain stabilization over time rather than being a static rigid structure. This dynamic mechanism prevents loosening by continuously engaging the bone surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring member is tensioned to a specific force parameter during implantation that optimizes both structural strength and long-term stability. The tensioning creates sufficient compression force for stabilization while avoiding excessive force that could cause adverse reactions or bone damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional stabilization devices are implanted, then immediate stabilization is achieved, but device removal becomes difficult and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate stabilizationVSAvoiddevice removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into separable components: the spring member can be independently removed from the bone anchors. This allows the spring to be extracted through a small incision while leaving the anchors in place, simplifying the removal procedure compared to removing an integrated rigid device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring member is designed to be extractable as a separate component. The anchors remain implanted in the bone providing continued support, while the tensioning spring can be removed through minimal incision, avoiding complex surgical procedures for device retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If the anchoring head incorporates two teeth for spring member engagement, then secure retention is improved, but the device profile increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention securityVSAvoiddevice profile
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The two teeth are positioned in an opposite facing configuration that engages the spring member from opposite directions. This dimensional arrangement provides secure retention while maintaining a compact profile by utilizing opposing engagement rather than stacking teeth linearly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The tooth configuration uses asymmetric opposite-facing positioning rather than symmetric stacking, allowing efficient space utilization that secures the spring member while minimizing the overall device profile and cross-sectional dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system maintains axial tension for continued compression, facilitating easy removal and minimizing adverse reactions, while allowing for flexible positioning and reduced manufacturing complexity.

Implementation Method 1

an elongate spring member comprising a plurality of beams, each including a lateral component free to deflect for stretching the spring member axially

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the rod advantageously comprises Nitinol that is superelastic (SE) at body temperature (i.e., having an Af below about 37° C.) so that its distal end may be pulled from such location or engagement without fracture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperelasticity: Pseudoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11045236B2Active tension bone and joint stabilization methods
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 MEDEON BIODESIGN
  • US11045236B2 patent drawing
  • US11045236B2 patent drawing
  • US11045236B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of use for bone and joint stabilization devices are described in which the devices are tensioned after anchoring during a medical procedure and remain active in maintaining axial tension for continued compression of the subject anatomy.