Active Vibration Cancellation in Aircraft Engine Mounts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft cabin tonal noise is generated by engine vibrations due to residual imbalances in rotating components, which propagate through the wing and fuselage, causing low-frequency noise that can lead to passenger fatigue and increased noise penalties, and existing soft engine mounts are unreliable and undesirable for large commercial aircraft.

Innovation Solution

Active vibration mechanisms, such as powered actuators, are attached to engine mounts to monitor and cancel or dissipate tonal vibrations by injecting anti-vibration movements or dynamic energy absorbers, using sensors to determine fundamental frequencies and generate counteracting signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If soft engine mounts are used to reduce vibration transmission, then vibration isolation is improved, but reliability and durability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration transmissionVSAvoidreliability and durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the vibration isolation function from the mounting structure by adding independent active vibration mechanisms (actuators) to the existing hard mount, rather than replacing the mount with a soft isolator. This segmentation allows the hard mount to maintain structural reliability while the active mechanisms handle vibration cancellation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the passive mechanical vibration isolation of soft mounts with an active control system using powered actuators that generate counter-vibrations. This substitution maintains the mechanical simplicity and reliability of hard mounts while achieving vibration isolation through electronic control and actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If soft engine mounts are used to reduce vibration transmission, then vibration isolation is improved, but displacement during engine speed up increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration transmissionVSAvoiddisplacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the static support function (handled by the hard mount with minimal displacement) from the dynamic vibration cancellation function (handled by active actuators). This allows the mount to remain rigid during engine speed-up while active mechanisms cancel vibrations at operating speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The active vibration mechanisms are dynamically activated based on engine operating conditions, providing vibration cancellation when needed while maintaining the static rigidity of the hard mount during transient operations like engine speed-up.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If hard engine mounts are used to maintain reliability, then reliability is improved, but vibration transmission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability and durabilityVSAvoidvibration transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the advantages of hard mounts (reliability, durability, low displacement) with active vibration control mechanisms. The hard mount provides reliable mechanical support while integrated actuators actively cancel vibrations, combining the benefits of both hard and soft mount approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the passive mechanical vibration isolation of soft mounts with an active control system that uses sensors and actuators to generate counter-vibrations, thereby maintaining the reliability of hard mounts while eliminating their vibration transmission drawback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If active vibration mechanisms are added to cancel vibrations, then vibration isolation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration transmissionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The active vibration mechanisms are integrated into the existing engine mount structure, allowing the mount to serve both mechanical support and vibration cancellation functions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and minimizes overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors mounted on the engine and fuselage to automatically detect vibrations and triggers the actuators to generate counter-vibrations without external intervention. This self-regulating control system reduces the need for complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces vibration transmissibility and noise levels by minimizing the amplification of engine vibrations, providing a reliable alternative to traditional soft mounts while maintaining low displacement during engine operation.

Implementation Method 1

powered actuators attached to the structure in the vicinity of, or embedded within, the engine mount to inject anti-vibration movements to cancel the tonal vibrations generated by the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

vibration sensors are placed on the engine and/or fuselage and/or wing structure to monitor the vibration performance of the engine and engine mount structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration sensing: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS8439299B2Active cancellation and vibration isolation with feedback and feedforward control for an aircraft engine mount
Publication Date: 2013.05.14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US8439299B2 patent drawing
  • US8439299B2 patent drawing
  • US8439299B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine mount structure is provided with active vibration mechanisms which are attached in the vicinity of the engine mount to prevent engine vibrations from propagating into the engine mounting structure, for example, the wing or fuselage structure of an aircraft. Additionally, sensors are provided on the engine and/or wing/fuselage structure to provide control signals to the active vibration mechanisms so that the active vibration mechanism react to the sensed data to minimize the vibration transmissibility from the engine into the wing/fuselage.